BIODIVERSITY, CULTURE AND BIOECONOMY IN LATIN AMERICA
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
In Latin America, the immense existing biodiversity is associated with the abundance of enormous practically unknown regions and the presence of indigenous peoples, in some cases uncontacted. Along with the profusion of life forms that have been preserved over the years, the danger of genetic erosion caused by indiscriminate exploitation stands out on the one hand, and on the other the attempts at appropriation by institutions and natural persons, at the expense of the prejudice of the communities that inhabit those areas, of their habits of life and of their cultural practices. The purpose of this article is to reflect on these issues, based on the documentary information published by various authors. The examples presented also demonstrate that the region can take advantage of biodiversity for its own development, under a bioeconomy model, in which the efforts of science, education and production institutions coexist, supported by government policies of respect for the environment, indigenous populations and the legal protection of heritage.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.downloads##
Detalhes do artigo
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Responsabilidade dos autores:
São responsáveis pelas ideias e dados recopilados nos manuscritos, pela fidelidade da informação, pela correção das citações, pelos direitos para publicar qualquer material incluído no texto pela apresentação do manuscrito no formato requerido pela Revista (arquivo web). Um manuscrito enviado a CHAKIÑAN não deve estar publicado com anterioridade, nem mesmo haver sido apresentado da mesma forma a outro meio de publicação.
Direitos do Autor:
Os artigos publicados não comprometem necessariamente o ponto de vista da REVISTA CHAKIÑAN. A revista se alinha a política da licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-No comercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0). Cada autor conserva o direito sobre o artigo pulicado na Chakiñan.
Declaração de privacidade
Os dados pessoais e endereços de e-mail inseridos nesta revista serão usados exclusivamente para os fins declarados na publicação e não estarão disponíveis para nenhum outro objetivo ou pessoa
Como Citar
##plugins.generic.shariff.share##
Referências
Angerer, K. (2015). Estudio de caso 1: Epipedobates anthonyi bajo la apertura delimitada. En: Recursos Genéticos como Información Natural (M. Ruiz-Muller, ed.). 2da ed. Sociedad Peruana de Derecho Ambiental, Lima, Perú.
Beltrán, Y. J. (2016). La biocolonialidad en las relaciones entre investigadores de la biodiversidad y las comunidades en Colombia. Tabula Rasa, 24, 213-240.
Beltrán, Y. (2017). Violencia epistémica en la protección de los conocimientos “tradicionales”. Ciencia Política, 12(24), 115-136.
Beyer, S. (3 de enero de 2008). Singing to the plants. https://singingtotheplants.com/2008/01/ayahuasca-patent-case/
Bouso, J. C. & Sánchez, C. (2020). Traditional healing practices involving psychoactive plants and the global mental health agenda: opportunities, pitfalls, and challenges in the “right to science” framework. Health and Human Rights Journal, 22(1), 145-150.
Cassels, B. K. & Sáez, P. (2018). Dark classics in chemical neuroscience: mescaline. ACS Chemical Neuroscience, 9(10), 2448-2458.
Clavijo, N. (2018). Etnobotánica de Lophophora williamsii (Tesis de grado). Universidad de Sevilla, España. https://idus.us.es/bitstream/handle/11441/70936/CLAVIJO%20GONZ%c3%81LEZ%2c%20NAZARET.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Das, G., Lim, K. J., Tantengco, O. A. G., Carag, H. M., Gonçalves, S., Romano, A., Das, S. K., Coy-Barrera, E., Shin, H. S., Gutiérrez-Gurjalva, E. P., Heredia, J. B. & Patra, J. K. (2020). Cactus: Chemical, nutraceutical composition and potential bio-pharmacological properties. Phytotherapy Research, 35(3). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ptr.6889
Dinis-Oliveira, R. J., Lança, C. & Días, D. (2019). Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects of peyote and mescaline: clinical and forensic repercussions. Current Molecular Pharmacology, 12, 184-194.
Domínguez, E., Soler, J., Elices, M., Pascual, J. C., Álvarez, E., De la Fuente, M., Friedlander, P., Feilding, A. & Riba. J. (2016). Ayahuasca: pharmacology, neuroscience and therapeutic potential. Brain Research Bulletin, 126, 89-101.
El Universo. (5 de diciembre 2021). En Ecuador la producción de harina de mosca, que ya se inició, reduciría emisiones de CO2 y la deforestación. https://www.eluniverso.com/larevista/ecologia/en-ecuador-la-produccion-de-harina-de-mosca-que-ya-se-inicio-reduciria-emisiones-de-co2-y-la-deforestacion-nota/
Escobar, G. (2015). Las propiedades farmacocinéticas del ayahuasca. Liberabit, 21(2), 313-319.
González, M. E. (2013). Chirimoya (Annona cherimola Miller), frutal tropical y sub-tropical de valores promisorios. Cultivos Tropicales, 34(3), 52-63.
González, C. M., Garzón, R. & Rosell, C. M. (2019). Insects as ingredients for bakery goods. A comparison study of H. illucens, A. domestica and T. molitor flours. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 51, 205-210.
GRAIN. (17 de diciembre 1998). Biopiratería en Ecuador. https://grain.org/fr/article/entries/864-biopirateriaen-ecuador?print=true
Gutiérrez, M. T., Durán, A. G., Mejías, F. J. R., Molinillo, J. M. G., Megias, D., Valdivia, M. M. & Macías, F. A. (2020). Bio-guided isolation of acetogenins from Annona cherimola deciduous leaves: production of nanocarriers to boost the bioavailability properties. Molecules, 25, 4861.
Hodson, E., Henry, G. y Trigo, E. (2019). La bioeconomía. Nuevo marco para el crecimiento sostenible en América Latina. Bogotá: Ed. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, 384 pp.
Ibarra, E., Zamudio, F., Pérez, C. A., Albert, V. A., Ramírez, E., Molina, J., Fernández, A., Calderón, C., Olivares, J. L., Herrera, A. & Herrera, L. (2015). De novo sequencing and analysis of Lophophora williamsii transcriptome, and searching for putative genes involved in mescaline biosynthesis. BMC Genomics, 16, 657.
Jurado, M. A. (2021). Nuevos retos para los Estados respecto a la biopiratería en el contexto del discurso de la conservación de la biodiversidad: el caso de Ecuador. Sociedad y Ambiente, 24, 1-20.
Klier, G. (2016). La naturaleza que se conserva: una aproximación al concepto de biodiversidad. Apuntes de Investigación del CECYP, 27, 206-217.
León, D. C. y Cárdenas, J. C. (2020). Latinoamérica y el Caribe: Riqueza natural y degradación ambiental en siglo XXI. PNUD LAC, 14B, 1-35. https://www1.undp.org/content/dam/rblac/Policy%20Papers%20COVID%2019/undp-rblac-CD19-PDS-Number14B.pdf
León, G., Pájaro, N. & Granados, C. (2020). Annonaceae squamosa una fuente de acetogeninas en la actualidad. Ciencia y Salud Virtual, 12(2), 88-101.
Martínez, E., Ripoll, Y., Atencio, P. y Ontivero, M. (2018). Biodiversidad en América Latina. Un desafío dialógico del patrimonio natural entre los recursos y los bienes. Multequina, 27, 55-61.
Meitiyani, R. E., Dharma, A. P. & Annisa, R. (2020). Combination of Hermetia illucens L. maggot flour with fish feed against growth of Sangkuriang catifsh (Clarias sp.). Systematic Review Pharmacy, 11(1), 529-535.
Naciones Unidas. (1992). Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica. https://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-es.pdf
Naik, A. V., Dessai, S. N. & Sellappan, K. (2021). Antitumour activity of Annona muricata L. leaf methanol extracts against Ehrlich ascites carcinoma and Dalton’s lymphoma ascites mediated tumours in Swiss albino mice. Libyan Journal of Medicine, 16(1), 1846862.
Nayak, A. & Hedge, K. (2021). A comprehensive review on the miracle nature of Annona muricata Linn. RGUHS Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 11(1), 1-8.
Newman, D. J. & Cragg, G. M. (2016). Natural products as sources of new drugs from 1981 to 2014. Journal of Natural Products, 79, 629-661.
Philp, J. C. (2015). Balancing the bioeconomy: supporting biofuels and bio-based materials in public policy. Energy & Environmental Science, 8, 3063-3068.
Proto, F. (2919). Biopiratería o participación justa en los beneficios que se deriven de la utilización de los recursos genéticos y conocimientos tradicionales de comunidades rurales- indígenas en países del Sur global. Analéctica, 5, 32.
Sanches, R. F., Osório, F. L., Dos Santos, R. G., Macedo, L. R. H., Maia-de-Oliveira, J. P. Wichert-Ana, L., De Araujo, D. B., Riba, J., Crippa, J. A. S. & Hallak, J. E. C. (2016). Antidepressant effects of a single dose of ayahuasca in patients with recurrent depression. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 36(1), 77-81.
Santos, M. S. & Camarena, N. G. (2019). Cacti for production of metabolites: current state and perspectives. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 103(21-22), 8657-8667.
Tinoco, J. C. (2015). Una experiencia latinoamericana en protección de los conocimientos tradicionales. El especial caso de Bolivia y Brasil. Revista Iberoamericana de la Propiedad Intelectual, 3, 37-95.
Toro, C. (2007). Seguridad hemisférica, propiedad intelectual y biodiversidad en el marco de las negociaciones del TLC andino. Revista Pensamiento Jurídico, 18, 73-102.
UNEP. (8 de junio 2018). Latin American and Caribbean countries champion marine conservation. United Nations Environment Programme. https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/latin-american-and-caribbean-countries-champion-marine-conservation
Valli, M., Russo, H. M. & Bolzani, V. S. (2018). The potential contribution of the natural products from Brazilian biodiversity to bioeconomy. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 90(1 Suppl. 1), 763-778.
Wahid, A. S., Purwanti, S., Daryatmo & Auza, F. A. (2021). Substitution of fishmeal with black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens L) against the performance of native chickens grower phase. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 788, 012182.