ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ChatGPT) IN UNIVERSITY EDUCATION: REALITY AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Article Sidebar

Portada Chakiñan Preprint Papers
PDF (Spanish)
Published: Aug 6, 2024
Keywords:
artificial intelligence, education, virtual learning

Main Article Content

Eduardo Fidel Héctor Ardisana
Universidad Técnica de Manabí
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1371-7345
Bárbara Millet Gaínza
Investigadora independiente
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4848-0950

Abstract

The recent introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) tools into university education, especially ChatGPT, has raised concerns among teachers and educational managers in two major areas. One is the mishandling of these technologies by students, leading to plagiarism and academic dishonesty; the other is the depth of their learning, along with the potential replacement of teachers by AI. In this context, a qualitative investigation was carried out to analyze the use of ChatGPT in university education, formulating ethical considerations about its use. A phenomenological design was used to describe, from a hermeneutical approach, the experiences and opinions of authors regarding the use of this AI tool at the university, as well as their ethical positions. ChatGPT responses to questions about the topics studied were also analyzed. It is concluded that the use of AI technologies, particularly ChatGPT, in university education will continue to rise. Based on the potential dangers detected, a more complex conception of teaching tasks is considered necessary, requiring a creative effort still inaccessible to AI, and a reinforcement of ethical values to counter the misuse of these technologies by consumers.


 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Héctor Ardisana, E. F., & Millet Gaínza, B. (2024). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ChatGPT) IN UNIVERSITY EDUCATION: REALITY AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS. CHAKIÑAN, Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. https://chakinan.unach.edu.ec/index.php/chakinan/article/view/1185
Issue
Chakiñan PREPRINT PAPERS
Section
RESEARCH ARTICLES
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Responsibility of the authors:
The authors are responsible for the ideas and data collected in the manuscripts. They are additionally accountable for the fidelity of the information, the correction of the citations, the right to publish any material included in the text, and the presentation of the manuscript in the format required by the Journal (WORD template). A manuscript forwarded to CHAKIÑAN must not have been published before, nor must it have been submitted to another means of publication.

Copyright:
Published articles do not necessarily compromise the viewpoint of the CHAKIÑAN JOURNAL. The Journal is aligned to the policy of the licence de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-No comercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0). Each author retains the right to the paper published in the Chakiñan journal.

Privacy statement

The personal data and email addresses entered in this magazine will be used exclusively for the purposes stated by the publication and will not be available for any other purpose or person.

Author Biographies

Eduardo Fidel Héctor Ardisana, Universidad Técnica de Manabí

Universidad Técnica de Manabí, Facultad de Posgrado, Portoviejo, Ecuador

Bárbara Millet Gaínza, Investigadora independiente

Licenciada en Estudios Socioculturales y Magister en Extensión Agraria por la Universidad Agraria de La Habana, Cuba. En Ecuador ha laborado como docente en la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador (sede Manabí).

How to Cite

Héctor Ardisana, E. F., & Millet Gaínza, B. (2024). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ChatGPT) IN UNIVERSITY EDUCATION: REALITY AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS. CHAKIÑAN, Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. https://chakinan.unach.edu.ec/index.php/chakinan/article/view/1185

Share

References

Álvarez, E., Heredia, H., & Romero, M. F. (2019). La generación Z y las redes sociales. Una visión desde los adolescentes en España. Espacios, 40(20), 1-13. https://n9.cl/oqbt8

Álvarez-Gayou, J. L. (2003). Cómo hacer investigación cualitativa. Fundamentos y metodología. Paidos Educador.

Anders, B. A. (2023). Is using ChatGPT cheating, plagiarism, both, neither, or forward thinking? Patterns, 4(4), 100694. https://n9.cl/a7xku2

Anyoha, R. (28 de agosto de 2017). The History of Artificial Intelligence. Science in the News. https://n9.cl/cg7fs

Ausat, A., Massang, B., Efendi, M., Nofirman, N., & Riady, Y. (2023). Can ChatGPT replace the role of the teacher in the classroom: a fundamental analysis. Journal on Education, 5(4), 16100-16106. https://n9.cl/tog5w

Barnett, S. (1 de febrero de 2023). ChatGPT obliga a las universidades a replantearse el plagio. Wired. https://n9.cl/imnvet

Bartolomé, A. R., & Steffens, K. (2015). Are MOOCs promising learning environments? Comunicar, 44(XXII), 91-99. https://n9.cl/zxg1q

Campbell, M., Hoane, A. J., & Hsu, F. H. (2002). Deep Blue. Artificial Intelligence, 134(1-2), 57-83. https://n9.cl/6zcj64

Castillejos, B. (2022). Inteligencia artificial y entornos personales de aprendizaje: atentos al uso adecuado de los recursos tecnológicos de los estudiantes universitarios. Educación, 31(60), 9-24. https://n9.cl/jt5ti

Chávez, O. (2023). Tan lejos de la investigación científica, tan cerca de la inteligencia artificial. Revista de Enfermería del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 31(2), 37-38. https://n9.cl/hvwtpo

Curran, N. M., Sun, J., & Hong, J. W. (2019). Anthropomorphizing AlphaGo: a content analysis of the framing of Google DeepMind’s AlphaGo in the Chinese and American press. AI & Society, 35(3), 727-735. https://n9.cl/kvgchr

De la Cruz, J. R. (15 de junio de 2023). ChatGPT: plagios, derecho de autor y propiedad intelectual. Legálitas. https://n9.cl/yfmqma

Díaz, D. (2023). Inteligencia artificial vs. Turnitin: implicaciones para el plagio académico. Revista Cognosis, VIII(1), 15-26. https://n9.cl/nbhow

García, F. J. (2023). The perception of artificial intelligence in educational contexts after the launch of ChatGPT: disruption or panic? Education in the Kwnoledge Society, 24, e31279. https://n9.cl/xr2la

Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza, C. P. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw Hill Interamericana.

Ibarra, A. J., Aguayo, Z., & Velázquez, R. E. (2023). Desmitificando el plagio digital: percepciones y realidades de la ética estudiantil desde el Centro Universitario de Tonalá. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, IV(5), 1419-1431. https://n9.cl/mwpo3

Isín, M. D., Torres, P., Choque, J. M., & Hidalgo, I. M. (2024). Integrating ChatGPT into education: exploring its pedagogical impact and potential. Migration Letters, 21(S1), 183-192. https://n9.cl/ye8ul

Kem, D. (2022). Personalised and adaptive learning: emerging learning platforms in the era of digital and smart learning. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 5(02), 385-391. https://n9.cl/8yyst

Lang, M. C. (2022). La inteligencia artificial en la administración de justicia. Ars Iuris Salmanticensis, 10, 31-39. https://n9.cl/nn2nn

Lasso, L. A., & Conde, K. N. (2021). Khan Academy como herramienta en el aprendizaje de las matemáticas y la programación. Revista Interamericana de Investigación, Educación y Pedagogía, 14(1), 225-250. https://n9.cl/5qrn8

López-Zárate, R. (2023). Educación y valores. A propósito del plagio de una tesis de licenciatura presumiblemente efectuada por una Ministra de la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 28(97), 651-659. https://n9.cl/9n20x2

McCabe, D. L. (2005). Cheating among college and university students: A North American perspective. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 1(1). https://n9.cl/xjoox

Mertens, D. M. (2015). Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. Sage Publications.

Montomoli, M. (2023). Un cambio de era: cómo la inteligencia artificial está revolucionando la publicación científica. NefroPlus, 15(1), 112-114. https://n9.cl/epmdb

Moor, J. (2006). The Dartmouth College Artificial Intelligence Conference: The Next Fifty Years. AI Magazine, 27(4), 87-91. https://n9.cl/qnt3v

OpenAI. (30 de noviembre de 2023). Introducing ChatGPT. https://n9.cl/peo57p

Rodríguez, R., Gutiérrez, J. D., Conejero, J. M., & Prieto, A. E. (2024). Análisis del desempeño de ChatGPT en exámenes de Ingeniería Informática. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologías del Aprendizaje, 19, 71-80. https://n9.cl/sn7v3

Salvatierra, A., Romero, S., & Shardin, L. (2021). Khan Academy: Fortalecimiento del aprendizaje de Cálculo I en estudiantes universitarios. Propósitos y Representaciones, 9(1), e1042. https://n9.cl/tw1b3

Segovia, N. (2023). Percepción y uso de los chatbots entre estudiantes de posgrado online: Un estudio exploratorio. Revista de Investigación en Educación, 21(3), 335-349. https://n9.cl/kijxa

Thorp, H. H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379, 313. https://n9.cl/zw83q

Ubal, M., Tambasco, P., Martínez, S., & García, M. (2023). El impacto de la Inteligencia Artificial en la educación. Riesgos y potencialidades de la IA en el aula. Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa, 15, 41-57. https://n9.cl/5s66y

Yang, Q. F., Lian, L. W., & Zhao, J. H. (2023). Developing a gamified artifcial intelligence educational robot to promote learning effectiveness and behavior in laboratory safety courses for undergraduate students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 18. https://n9.cl/8gahz