PEDAGOGICAL WORKSHEETS FOR EMERGENCY REMOTE EDUCATION IN MULTIGRADE SCHOOLS

Article Sidebar

PDF (Spanish) HTML (Spanish) EPUB (Spanish)
Published: Nov 21, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37135/chk.002.19.05
Keywords:
Pedagogical worksheets remote education emergency, multigrade schools, actor-network theory

Main Article Content

Miguel Ángel Herrera Pavo
Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Quito, Ecuador
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0321-7235
María Gladys Cochancela Patiño
Universidad Nacional de Educación. Cañar, Ecuador.
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8845-9710
Julio Rodolfo Uyaguari Fernández
Universidad Nacional de Educación. Cañar, Ecuador.
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8845-9710

Abstract

During the emergency remote education caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Ecuadorian Ministry of Education organized educational activities around pedagogical worksheets that included prioritized elements of the national curriculum. The objective is to analyse how the cards were put into action in the educational institutions, reviewing what kind of practices emerged around them. The praxeological method and the Actor-Network Theory toolbox are used based on ethnographic material collected in multigrade schools in the Gualaceo canton, in the Azuay province. The findings describe the socio-technical networks formed by the introduction of pedagogical worksheets, as well as how they evolved into a powerful token that orders educational processes. It is concluded that the power of translation of the network generated around the pedagogical worksheets made them referents for the control of the learning process and the teaching action from the administrative instances, reinforcing the technocratic role of the teachers and atomizing the didactic process in terms of activities that are little articulated and meaningful.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Herrera Pavo, M. Ángel, Cochancela Patiño, M. G., & Uyaguari Fernández, J. R. (2022). PEDAGOGICAL WORKSHEETS FOR EMERGENCY REMOTE EDUCATION IN MULTIGRADE SCHOOLS. CHAKIÑAN, Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 19, 85-101. https://doi.org/10.37135/chk.002.19.05
Issue
No. 19: April 2023
Section
RESEARCH ARTICLES
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Responsibility of the authors:
The authors are responsible for the ideas and data collected in the manuscripts. They are additionally accountable for the fidelity of the information, the correction of the citations, the right to publish any material included in the text, and the presentation of the manuscript in the format required by the Journal (WORD template). A manuscript forwarded to CHAKIÑAN must not have been published before, nor must it have been submitted to another means of publication.

Copyright:
Published articles do not necessarily compromise the viewpoint of the CHAKIÑAN JOURNAL. The Journal is aligned to the policy of the licence de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-No comercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0). Each author retains the right to the paper published in the Chakiñan journal.

Privacy statement

The personal data and email addresses entered in this magazine will be used exclusively for the purposes stated by the publication and will not be available for any other purpose or person.

Author Biography

Miguel Ángel Herrera Pavo, Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Quito, Ecuador

Sede Ecuador, Área de Educación

How to Cite

Herrera Pavo, M. Ángel, Cochancela Patiño, M. G., & Uyaguari Fernández, J. R. (2022). PEDAGOGICAL WORKSHEETS FOR EMERGENCY REMOTE EDUCATION IN MULTIGRADE SCHOOLS. CHAKIÑAN, Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 19, 85-101. https://doi.org/10.37135/chk.002.19.05

Share

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Almén, L. y Bagga-Gupta, S. (2019). Inscriptions and Digitalization Initiatives Across Time in the Nation-State of Sweden: The Relevance of Shifts and Continuities in Policy Accounts for Teachers’ Work. En S. Bagga-Gupta, G. Messina Dahlberg y Y. Lindberg (eds.), Virtual Sites as Learning Spaces: Critical Issues on Languaging Research in Changing Eduscapes (pp. 27-62). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26929-6_2

Appova, A., Lee, H. J. & Bucci, T. (2022). Technology in the Classroom: Banking Education or Opportunities to Learn? Theory Into Practice, 61(3), 254-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2022.2096372

Byrd, D. (2019). Uncovering Hegemony in Higher Education: A Critical Appraisal of the Use of “Institutional Habitus” in Empirical Scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 89(2),171-210. http://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318812915

Callon, M. (1984). Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review, 32(1_suppl), 196-233. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.1984.tb00113.x

Edwards, R. (2012). Translating the Prescribed into the Enacted Curriculum. En T. Fenwick y R. Edwards (eds.), Researching Education Through Actor-Network Theory (pp. 23-39). Nueva Jersey, Estados Unidos: Wiley-Blackwell.

Hyysalo, S., Jensen, T. E. & Oudshoorn, N. (2016). Introduction to the New Production of Users. En S. Hyysalo, T. E. Jensen y N. Oudshoorn. The New Production of Users. Changing Innovation Collectives and Involvement Strategies (pp. 1-41). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315648088-1

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R. y Nixon, R. (2014). Doing Critical Participatory Action Research: The ‘Planner’ Part. En S. Kemmis, R. McTaggart y R. Nixon (eds.), The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research (pp. 85-114). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2_5

Larrión, J. (2019). Teoría del Actor-Red. Síntesis y evaluación de la deriva postsocial de Bruno Latour. RES. Revista Española de Sociología, 28(2), 323-341. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/res/article/view/71437

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford, Reino Unido: Oxford University Press. https://books.google.com.ec/books?id=AbQSDAAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&dq=Reassembling%20the%20Social%3A%20An%20Introduction%20to%20Actor-Network-Theory&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false

Law, J. (2004). After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203481141

Law, J. (2008). Actor Network Theory and Material Semiotics. En B. S. Turner. The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory (pp. 141-158). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444304992.ch7

Law, J. y Singleton, V. (2005). Object Lessons. Organization, 12(3), 331-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508405051270

Matthews, A. (2021). Blurring boundaries between humans and technology: Postdigital, postphenomenology and actor-network theory in qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(1), 26-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2020.1836508

Mifsud, D. (2020). A Critical Review of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and Its Use in Education Research. En E. C. Idemudia (ed.), Handbook of Research on Social and Organizational Dynamics in the Digital Era (pp. 135-56). http://10.4018/978-1-5225-8933-4.ch007

Ministerio de Educación (2020a). Acuerdo nro. MINEDUC-MINEDUC-2020-00044-A. https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2020/09/MINEDUC-MINEDUC-2020-00044-A.pdf

Ministerio de Educación. (2020b). Aprendiendo desde casa. Guía para estudiantes y sus familias o acompañantes de Educación General Básica ordinaria y extraordinaria (NAP) Régimen Sierra-Amazonía. https://recursos2.educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Gui%CC%81a_EGB_ordinaria_extraordinaria_SIERRA_NAP.pdf

Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, Estados Unidos: Duke University Press.

Nespor, J. (2004). Educational scale-making. Pedagogy, Culture y Society, 12(3), 309-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360400200205

Ribosa, J. (2020). El docente socioconstructivista: un héroe sin capa. Educar, 56(1), 77-90. http://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.1072

Royle, K. (2021). What’s Good What’s Bad? Conceptualising Teaching and Learning Methods as Technologies Using Actor Network Theory in the Context of Palestinian Higher Education. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(1), 120-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00138-z

Schatzki, T. (2018). On Practice Theory, or What’s Practices Got to Do (Got to Do) with It? En C. Edwards-Groves, P. Grootenboer y J. Wilkinson (Eds.), Education in an Era of Schooling: Critical perspectives of Educational Practice and Action Research. A Festschrift for Stephen Kemmis (pp. 151-165). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2053-8_11

Schmidt, R. (2016). The methodological challenges of practising praxeology. En G. Spaargaren, D. Weenink y M. Lamers (eds.), Practice Theory and Research (pp. 43-59). https://doi.org/10.4324/978131565690

Silseth, K., Hontvedt, M. & Mäkitalo, Å. (2022). Teachers’ enactment of policy in classrooms: Making students accountable through inscriptions from the curriculum in classroom interactions. European Journal of Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00610-3

Stalph, F. (2019). Hybrids, materiality, and black boxes: Concepts of actor-network theory in data journalism research. Sociology Compass, 13(11), e12738. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12738

Star, S. L. & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional Ecology, `Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001