TUTORIAL PEDAGOGICAL MEDIATION AND PERFORMANCE IN SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS, IQUITOS
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study evaluated the impact of tutorial pedagogical mediation on the academic performance of 10th-grade students in the course of Personal Development, Citizenship, and Civics (DPCC) at Educational Institution No. 60054 José Silfo Alván del Castillo, located in Iquitos, Peru, during 2024. The study analyzed how this strategy strengthens self-perception and holistic learning. A quasi-experimental design was employed, using pre-test/post-test measures on a group of 32 students selected from a population of 58 fifth-year secondary students through proportional stratified probability sampling. Data for the analysis were collected by administering the Self-Perception Questionnaire in pre- and post-tests, along with grades obtained before and after the tutorial mediation intervention. The findings revealed a significant positive effect across the four dimensions assessed: content comprehension, study skills, participation and attitude, and academic assessment and performance, with notable improvements following the intervention. Tutorial mediation serves as a fundamental pillar in secondary education, integrating formal instruction with personalized support; it brings together metacognitive, socio-affective, and disciplinary processes, redefining learning: error as an opportunity, assessment as formative (not punitive), and participation as the collective construction of knowledge.
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Responsibility of the authors:
The authors are responsible for the ideas and data collected in the manuscripts. They are additionally accountable for the fidelity of the information, the correction of the citations, the right to publish any material included in the text, and the presentation of the manuscript in the format required by the Journal (WORD template). A manuscript forwarded to CHAKIÑAN must not have been published before, nor must it have been submitted to another means of publication.
Copyright:
Published articles do not necessarily compromise the viewpoint of the CHAKIÑAN JOURNAL. The Journal is aligned to the policy of the licence de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-No comercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0). Each author retains the right to the paper published in the Chakiñan journal.
Privacy statement
The personal data and email addresses entered in this magazine will be used exclusively for the purposes stated by the publication and will not be available for any other purpose or person.
How to Cite
Share
References
Aldrup, K., Carstensen, B. & Klusmann, U. (2022). Is Empathy the Key to Effective Teaching? A Systematic Review of Its Association with Teacher-Student Interactions and Student Outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 1177-1216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09649-y
Alonso-García, S., Rodríguez-García, A. M., & Cáceres-Reche, M. (2018). Análisis de la acción tutorial y su incidencia en el desarrollo integral del alumnado. El caso de la Universidad de Castilla La Mancha, España. Formación Universitaria, 11(3), 63-72. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062018000300063
Álvarez, M., & Bisquerra, R. (2021). Manual de orientación y tutoría. Wolters Kluwer Education.
Alzate-Ortiz, F. A., & Castañeda-Patiño, J. C. (2020). Mediación pedagógica: clave de una educación humanizante y transformadora. Una mirada desde la estética y la comunicación. Educare, 24(1), 1-14. http://doi.org/10.15359/ree.24-1.21
Artunduaga, N. (2024). Factores Asociados al rendimiento académico en educación secundaria: una revisión sistemática. Revista de Psicología y Educación, 19(2), 73-85. https://doi.org/10.23923/rpye2024.02.252
Bello, V., Espinoza, Y., Balta, G., & Condor, B. (2024). Estrategias didácticas y la mediación pedagógica en el desarrollo del pensamiento crítico en estudiantes de educación secundaria. Aula Virtual, 5(12), 120-132. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11109491
Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Castellaro, M., & Peralta, N. (2020). Pensar el conocimiento escolar desde el socioconstructivismo: interacción, construcción y contexto. Perfiles Educativos, 42(168), 140-156. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2020.168.59439
Charles, D. (2019). Measuring young children’s executive function and self-regulation in classrooms and other real-world settings. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 22, 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-019-00285-1
De la Torre, J. M., & Rojas, P. R. (2025). Nuevas metodologías para el fortalecimiento de la mediación pedagógica en la educación escolar inclusiva. Tribunal, 5(11), 359-378. https://doi.org/10.59659/revistatribunal.v5i11.162
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135-168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
Dunn, K. E., & Mulvenon, S. W. (2009). A critical review of research on formative assessment: the limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessment in education. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(7), 1-11. https://acortar.link/EXfCid
Espinoza, R. (2026). Propensión a mediar: experiencias educativas en territorios complejos y diversos. Enfoques Educacionales, 23(1), 135-160. https://doi.org/10.5354/2735-7279.2026.82707
Figueroa-Céspedes, I., & Jiménez, N. (2023). Rol mediador docente y aprendizaje autorregulado: modificabilidad, transformabilidad y dialogismo como principios para una pedagogía postpandemia. Revista Latinoamericana de Educación Inclusiva, 17(1), 59-75. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718-73782023000100059
Fleur, D. S., Bredeweg, B., & van den Bos, W. (2021). Metacognition: ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences. npj Science of Learning, 6, 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00089-5
Jarpa-Azagra, M., Bustos-Ibarra, A., Olivares-Jiménez, J., Kalfual-Catalán, C., & Montero, M. (2024). Consolidar la reflexión pedagógica para mejorar las prácticas de aula desde la escritura profesional docente. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 29(102), 657-681. https://ojs.rmie.mx/index.php/rmie/article/view/236/437
Kirschner, P. A., & Hendrick, C. (2020). “Cognitive Apprenticeship” Revisited. American Educator, 44(3), 37-52. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1272730.pdf
Martínez, J. (2024). Evaluación del rendimiento escolar: Perspectivas contemporáneas. Editorial Académica.
McKinnon, R. D., & Blair, C. (2019). Bidirectional relations among executive function, teacher–child relationships, and early reading and math achievement: A cross-lagged panel analysis. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 46, 152-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.03.011
Mulyadi, S., Heru, A., Wahyu, R. (2016).Student's Tutorial System Perception, Academic Self-Efficacy, and Creativity Effects on Self-Regulated Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 598-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.059.
R Core Team. (2024). R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. (Version 4.4) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org
Ramírez, L., Rodríguez, C. Barrón-Adame, J., & Cuevas, H. (2023). Factores predominantes que influyen en el indicador de rendimiento académico en los universitarios in situ. Acta Universitaria, 33. https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2023.3878
Revelle, W. (2023). psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. [R package]. https://cran.r-project.org/package=psych
Rodríguez, M. (2024). Orientación educativa y mediación pedagógica tutorial: Fundamentos para la práctica. Editorial Santillana.
Salluca, Y., Chipana, R., Borda, D., & Gonzales, A. (2024). Relación entre la percepción del rendimiento académico y la metacognición en estudiantes universitarios. Tribunal, 4(9), 101-117. https://doi.org/10.59659/revistatribunal.v4i9.68
Sánchez, A. (2023). Autoconcepto y rendimiento académico de estudiantes universitarios. Universidad, Ciencia y Tecnología, 27(118), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.47460/uct.v27i118.687
Siegel, D. J. (2020). The developing mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
Sousa, D. A. (2022). How the brain learns (6th ed.). Corwin Press.
Swanson, H. J., Ojutiku, A. & Dewsbury, B. (2024). The Impacts of an Academic Intervention Based in Metacognition on Academic Performance. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 12, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.12.12
The Jamovi project. (2024). Jamovi. (Version 2.6) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org
Tobón, S., & Lozano-Salmorán, E. (2024). Socioformative pedagogical practices and academic performance in students: Mediation of socioemotional skills. Heliyon, 10(15). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34898
Vaccaro, A. G., & Fleming, S. M. (2018). Reflexiones sobre el pensamiento: un metaanálisis basado en coordenadas de estudios de neuroimagen sobre juicios metacognitivos. Brain and Neuroscience Advances, 2. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2398212818810591
Wu, J., & Yu, X. (2025). The influence of formative assessment on academic performance: exploring the role of teachers’ emotional support. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1567615