META-ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF INTEGRATING VIRTUAL SIMULATORS INTO SCIENCE TEACHING
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Virtual simulators (VS) have become true knowledge scenarios, capable of transforming the abstract into the visible and the inaccessible into the manipulable. However, few studies have explored, analysed, and systematized the impact of VS on science education. The method was a systematic review that applied the SALSA methodology (Search, Assessment, Synthesis, and Analysis) and used meta-analysis to define the effect of VS on student learning. The sample consisted of 31 studies extracted from Scopus, SciELO, PubMed, and Latindex 2.0, in which the educational role of VAs over the last decade was first analysed; of these, 16 were meta-analysed, involving a total of 1,296 students. The standardized mean effect of SV interventions was large (1.73, 95% CI [1.00; 2.45]; Z = 4.67, p = .001) compared to traditional methods, with high heterogeneity (I² = 94.8%, p < .01); variables such as educational level, type of simulation, methodological approach, and program duration modulated the effectiveness of VEs. These findings support the use of VEs as an effective resource for science education, provided they are integrated into hybrid learning processes.
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Responsibility of the authors:
The authors are responsible for the ideas and data collected in the manuscripts. They are additionally accountable for the fidelity of the information, the correction of the citations, the right to publish any material included in the text, and the presentation of the manuscript in the format required by the Journal (WORD template). A manuscript forwarded to CHAKIÑAN must not have been published before, nor must it have been submitted to another means of publication.
Copyright:
Published articles do not necessarily compromise the viewpoint of the CHAKIÑAN JOURNAL. The Journal is aligned to the policy of the licence de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-No comercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0). Each author retains the right to the paper published in the Chakiñan journal.
Privacy statement
The personal data and email addresses entered in this magazine will be used exclusively for the purposes stated by the publication and will not be available for any other purpose or person.
How to Cite
Share
References
Bernal-García, M., Quemba-Mesa, M., Silva-Ortiz, S., & Pacheco-Olmos, B. (2022). Laboratorios tradicionales versus nuevas tecnologías para el estudio de anatomía humana en estudiantes de medicina: revisión sistemática y metaanálisis. International Journal of Morphology, 40(1), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022022000100030
Botella, J., & Zamora, Á. (2017). El metaanálisis: una metodología para la investigación en educación. Educación XX1, 20(2), 17-38. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.19030
Bruner, J. S. (1974). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.
Campos, G., & Benarroch, A. (2024). Laboratorios virtuales para la enseñanza de las ciencias: una revisión sistemática. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 42(2), 109-129. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.6040
Cao, X., Lu, H., Wu, Q., & Hsu, Y. (2025). Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of STEM education on students learning outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1579474. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1579474
Carbajal-Destre, P., Rodríguez-Barboza, J. R., Palacios-Garay, J., Ávila-Sánchez, G. A., & Cadenillas-Albornoz, V. (2022). Gamificación como técnica de motivación en el nivel superior. Horizontes, 6(23), 484-496. https://doi.org/10.33996/revistahorizontes.v6i23.351
Carrizo, N. (2021). ¿Cómo pueden aportar las tecnologías inmersivas a la educación ambiental? Electronic Journal of SADIO, 20(2), 84-97. http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/135623
Cobos, D., Jaén, E. L., López, E., Martín, A. H., & Molina, L. (2012). I Congreso Virtual Internacional sobre Innovación Pedagógica y Praxis Educativa Innovagogía 2012. AFOE. https://acortar.link/lgMEG0
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2.a ed.). Routledge.
Cueva, J. L., García, A., & Martínez, O. A. (2019). El conectivismo y las TIC: un paradigma que impacta el proceso enseñanza aprendizaje. Revista Scientific, 4(14), 205-227. https://doi.org/10.29394/Scientific.issn.2542-2987.2019.4.14.10.205-227
D’Angelo, C., Harris, C., & Rutstein, D. (2013). Systematic review and meta-analysis of STEM simulations. En N. Rummel, M. Kapur, M. Nathan, & S. Puntambekar. (Eds.), To see the world and a grain of sand: learning across levels of space, time, and scale: CSCL 2013 conference proceedings vol. 2-short papers, panels, posters, demos & community events, (pp. 239-240). ISLS. https://acortar.link/xSorPX
D’Angelo, C., Rutstein, D., Harris, C., Bernard, R., Borokhovski, E., & Haertel, G. (2014). Simulations for STEM learning: systematic review and meta-analysis. Menlo Park: SRI International, 5(23), 1-5. https://acortar.link/ZkJvqv
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Hernández, G. (2012). Enseñanza experimental. ¿cómo y para qué? Educación Química, 23, 92-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0187-893X(17)30139-8
Higgins, J. P. T. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327(7414), 557-560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
Kartimi, K., Yunita, Y., Addiin, I., & Shidiq, A. S. (2022). A bibliometric analysis on chemistry virtual laboratory. Educación Química, 33(2), 194-208, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.22201/fq.18708404e.2022.2.80579
Kebritchi, M., Hirumi, A., & Bai, H. (2010). The effects of modern mathematics computer games on mathematics achievement and class motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 427-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.007
Li, J., & Liang, W. (2024). Effectiveness of virtual laboratory in engineering education: A meta-analysis. PLOS One, 19(12), e0316269. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316269
Loorbach, N., Peters, O., Karreman, J., & Steehouder, M. (2015). Validation of the instructional materials motivation survey (IMMS) in a self‐directed instructional setting aimed at working with technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 204-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12138
Lorenzo, G. (2022). Análisis de la producción científica en el uso de la realidad virtual en la educación a partir de la estructura conceptual, social e intelectual. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 22(69), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.6018/red.502601
Martínez, A. G. (2005). La enseñanza problémica de las Ciencias Naturales. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 36(6), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie3662785
Mengist, W., Soromessa, T., & Legese, G. (2020). Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research. MethodsX, 7, 100777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777
Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2013). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033
Ortiz-Velásquez, N., Valencia-Cabrera, Y., Campoverde-Martínez, G., Flores-Cumbicus, R., & Núñez-Naranjo, A. (2025). El uso de simuladores digitales para la enseñanza de ciencias sociales. 593 Digital Publisher CEIT, 10(1-2), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.33386/593dp.2025.1-2.2960
Paxinou, E., Zafeiropoulos, V., Sypsas, A., Kiourt, C., & Kalles, D. (2017). Assessing the Impact of Virtualizing Physical Labs (Versión 1). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1711.11502
Penichet, A., & Mato, M. C. (1996). Las actitudes del alumnado de educación secundaria hacia las ciencias experimentales. Alambique, 9, 131-138. https://acortar.link/SRmkyT
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801-813. https://acortar.link/EI3y6k
Puicaño-Camavilca, A. L. (2024). Las TIC y su influencia en el aprendizaje significativo en una institución educativa peruana. Horizontes, 8(32), 225-235. https://doi.org/10.33996/revistahorizontes.v8i32.718
Reyes-Pozo, G. S., Correa-Asencio, E. I., Pauchi-Alvarado, L. M., Orrala-Bacilio, C. V., & Aquino Suarez, G. I. (2025). Uso de laboratorios virtuales como recurso didáctico para potenciar la enseñanza y el aprendizaje de ciencias naturales. Reincisol, 4(7), 3264-3281. https://doi.org/10.59282/reincisol.V4(7)3264-3281
Ronilo, A., & Castro, R. R. (2023). Effectiveness of virtual simulations in improving secondary students’ achievement in physics: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 533-556. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16229a
Rosli, R., & Ishak, N. A. (2024). Integration of virtual labs in science education: a systematic literature review. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matemaitk Malaysia, 14(1), 81-103. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol14.1.8.2024
Sánchez-Meca, J. (2022). Revisiones sistemáticas y meta-análisis en educación: un tutorial. Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa, 13, 5-40. https://doi.org/10.6018/riite.545451
Santos, M. L., & Prudente, M. (2022). Effectiveness of virtual laboratories in science education: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(2), 150-156. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.2.1598
Talan, T. (2020). The effect of simulation technique on academic achievement: a meta-analysis study. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 5(1), 17-36. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.141
Tong, L. K., Li, Y. Y., Au, M. L., Wang, S. C., & Ng, W. I. (2022). High-fidelity simulation duration and learning outcomes among undergraduate nursing students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today, 116, 105435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105435
Tüysüz, C. (2010). The effect of the virtual laboratory on students’ achievement and attitude in chemistry. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(1), 37-53. https://tinyurl.com/mvwjjnvw
Uslu-Sahan, F., Bilgin, A., & Ozdemir, L. (2023). Effectiveness of virtual reality simulation among bsn students: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 41(11), 921-929. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000001059
Villalobos-Molero, Á., & Romero-Alonso, R. (2023). Laboratorios remotos en educación superior: una revisión bibliográfica sistematizada. TE&ET, 35, 58-68. https://doi.org/10.24215/18509959.35.e7
Yaipén-Gonzales, H. F., Joo, L. A. P., Montenegro-Camacho, L., Soto, R. M. H., Cassano, P. P. G. D., & Mejia, P. J. C. (2023). Virtual simulators in the teaching-learning of chemistry and physics: a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology, 10(4), 632-641. https://doi.org/10.15379/ijmst.v10i4.2109
Yang, C., Zhang, J., Hu, Y., Yang, X., Chen, M., Shan, M., & Li, L. (2024). The impact of virtual reality on practical skills for students in science and engineering education: a meta-analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(28), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00487-2
Zárate-Moedano, R., Canchola-Magdaleno, S. L., & Suarez-Medellín, J. (2022). Estrategias didácticas y tecnología utilizada en la enseñanza de las ciencias. Una revisión sistemática. IE Revista de Investigación Educativa de la REDIECH, 13, e1396. https://doi.org/10.33010/ie_rie_rediech.v13i0.1396
Zaturrahmi, Z., Festiyed, F., & Ellizar, E. (2020). The utilization of virtual laboratory in learning: a meta-analysis. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 228-236. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v3i2.6474