PERCEPCIONES DE LOS MAESTROS DE INGLÉS SOBRE EL USO DE LOS MÓDULOS PEDAGÓGICOS EN ECUADOR: UNA ENTREVISTA DE GRUPO FOCAL
Barre latérale de l'article
Contenu principal de l'article
Résumé
Los libros de inglés son ampliamente utilizados como uno de los recursos más esenciales en la educación. Este estudio tiene como objetivo explorar las percepciones de los profesores ecuatorianos de inglés como lengua extranjera sobre la integración, utilidad, y funcionalidad de los módulos pedagógicos proporcionados por el Ministerio de Educación, así como su conexión con el currículum nacional ecuatoriano. Se realizó un diseño cualitativo exploratorio utilizando una entrevista de grupo focal a ocho maestros de inglés como lengua extranjera de primaria y secundaria. Los resultados de la entrevista del grupo focal indican que los maestros tienen percepciones positivas y negativas sobre el uso de estos módulos pedagógicos de inglés. Ellos están de acuerdo en que estos módulos pedagógicos promueven el aprendizaje de inglés de una manera contextualizada y auténtica al conectar aspectos del currículum nacional y los nuevos paradigmas relacionados a la enseñanza de inglés. No obstante, todos los maestros indicaron que la integración de estos nuevos módulos pedagógicos se llevó a cabo de manera confusa y desorganizada. Con base en los hallazgos, este estudio sugiere cambios constructivos a los especialistas que están a cargo de crear y editar dichos módulos para hacer que su integración, uso, y aplicación sean más eficientes.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.downloads##
Renseignements sur l'article
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.
Responsabilité des auteurs-res:
Ils sont responsables des idées et des données présentées dans les manuscrits, de l'exactitude des informations, de la véracité des citations, des droits de publication de tout matériel inclus dans le texte et de la présentation du manuscrit dans le format requis par la Revue (modèle web). Un manuscrit envoyé à CHAKIÑAN ne doit pas avoir été publié auparavant, ni avoir été présenté sous la même forme à un autre support de publication.
Droits d'auteur:
Les articles publiés n’engagent pas le point de vue de la REVUE CHAKIÑAN. La revue est conforme à la politique de la licence Creative Commons Reconocimiento-No comercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0). Chaque auteur conserve ses droits sur l'article publié dans Chakiñan.
Déclaration de confidentialité
Les données personnelles et les adresses e-mail saisies dans ce magazine seront utilisées exclusivement aux fins énoncées par la publication et ne seront disponibles à aucune autre fin ou personne.
Comment citer
##plugins.generic.shariff.share##
Références
Abdelwahab, M. M. (2013). Developing an English language textbook evaluative checklist. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 1(3), 55-70. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2IkFfPr
Ahmadi, A. & Derakhshan, A. (2016). EFL teachers' perceptions towards textbook evaluation. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(2), 260-267. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0602.06
Ahour, T., Towhidiyan, B. & Saeidi, M. (2014). The Evaluation of "English Textbook 2" Taught in Iranian High Schools from Teachers' Perspectives. English Language Teaching, 7(3), 150-158. doi:10.5539/elt.v7n3p150
Al Mamun, A. (2019). A content analysis of the English language development courses in Bangladeshi university English departments. Journal of Education and Learning, 8(6), 180-186. doi:10.5539/jel.v8n6p180
Ansary, H. & Babaii, E. (2002). Universal characteristics of EFL/ESL textbooks: A step towards systematic textbook evaluation. The Internet TESL Journal, 8(2), 1-9. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285764417_Universal_characteristics_of_EFLESL_textbook_A_step_towards_systematic_textbook_evaluation
Azadsarv, M. & Tahriri, A. (2014). Iranian language teachers and students' perspectives on Top Notch series (2nd edition) at intermediate level. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(6), 84-104. doi: 10.7575/aiac.alls.v.5n.6p.84
Beishuizen, J., Stoutjesdijk, E. & Van Putten, K. (1994). Studying textbooks: Effects of learning styles, study task, and instruction. Learning and Instruction, 4(2), 151-174. doi: 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90009-4
Bolderston, A. (2012). Conducting a research interview. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 43(1), 66-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2011.12.002
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 1(3), 185-216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
Burns, A. (2012). Text based teaching. In A. Burns & J.C Richards (Eds.). The Cambridge Guide to Pedagogy and Practice in Second Language Teaching (pp. 140-147). New York, United States of America: Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W. & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. United States of America: Sage publications.
Dahmardeh, M. (2009). Communicative textbooks: English language textbooks in Iranian secondary school. Linguistik Online, 40(4), 45-61. doi: 10.13092/lo.40.431
Ebrahimi, F. & Sahragard, R. (2017). Teachers' perceptions of the new English textbooks in Iranian junior high schools. Journal of Asia TEFL, 14(2), 355-363. doi: 10.18823/asiatefl.2017.14.2.12.355
Espinosa, L. & Soto, S. (2015). Curriculum development and its impact on EFL education in Ecuador. Machala, Ecuador: Ediciones UTMACH. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ligia_Espinosa_Cevallos/publication/312212659_Curriculum_Development_and_Its_Impact_on_EFL_Education_in_Ecuador/links/587667c108ae6eb871cf621a/Curriculum-Development-and-Its-Impact-on-EFL-Education-in-Ecuador.pdf
Fisne, F., Güngör, M., Guerra, L. & Gonçalves, O. (2018). A CEFR-Based Comparison of ELT Curriculum and Course Books Used in Turkish and Portuguese Primary Schools. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 12(2), 129-151. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1195279.pdf
González, P., Ochoa, C., Cabrera, P., Castillo, L., Quiñónez, A., Solano, …& Arias, M. (2015). EFL teaching in the amazon region of Ecuador: A focus on activities and resources for teaching listening and speaking skills. English Language Teaching, 8(8), 94-103. doi: 10.5539/elt.v8n8p94
Griffee, D. (2005). Research tips: Interview data collection. Journal of Developmental Education, 28(3), 36-37. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ718580.pdf
Hadley, G. (2018). Learning through textbooks. In A. Burns & J.C Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge Guide to Learning English as a Second Language (pp. 298-306). New York, United States of America: Cambridge University Press.
Jayakaran M. & Vahid N. (2012). Evaluative criteria of an English language textbook evaluation checklist. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(6), 1128-1134. doi:10.4304/jltr.3.6.1128-1134
Kabir, S. (2016). Methods of Data Collection. In Basic Guidelines for Research: An Introductory Approach for All Disciplines (pp. 201-275). Chittagong, Bangladesh: Book Zone Publication.
Kelle, U. (2010). The development of categories: different approaches in grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 191-213). doi: 10.4135/9781848607941
Kilickaya, F. (2019). Pre-service English teachers' views on course book evaluation and designing supplementary materials. Kastamonu Educational Journal, 27(2), 523-536. doi: 10.24106/kefdergi.2574
Legard, R., Keegan, J. & Ward, K. (2003). In-depth interviews. In Richie, J. & Lewis, J. (eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp.138-169). United States of América: SAGE publications.
López-Medina, B. (2016). Developing a CLIL textbook evaluation checklist. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 9(1), 159-173. doi: 10.5294/laclil.2016.9.1.7
Lozano, W. (2019). An analysis of the English textbooks and their connection with the curricular objectives in the Ecuadorian curriculum for sublevel superior to get an A2 level of English when finishing basic education (Master Thesis, Universidad Técnica de Ambato, Ambato, Ecuador). Retrieved from https://repositorio.uta.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/29717
Mahmoud, M. (2013). Developing an English language textbook evaluative checklist. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME), 1(3), 55-70. doi: 10.9790/7388-0135570
Ministerio de Educación. (2016). English language curriculum. Retrieved from https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2016/03/EFL1.pdf
Ministerio de Educación. (2014). National curriculum guidelines. Retrieved from https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2014/09/01-National-Curriculum-Guidelines-EFL-Agosto-2014.pdf
Mili & Winch, C. (2019). Teaching through textbooks: Teachers as practitioners of a discipline? Theory and Research in Education, 17(2), 181-201. doi: 10.1177/1477878519862547
Morgan, D. & Hoffman, K. (2018). A system for coding the interaction in focus groups and dyadic interviews. The Qualitative Report, 23(3), 519-531. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2733&context=tqr
Mukundan, J. & Nimehchisalem, V. (2012). Evaluative Criteria of an English Language Textbook Evaluation Checklist. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 3(6), 1128-1134. doi:10.4304/jltr.3.6.1128-1134
Naba'h, A., Samak, Z. & Massoud, H. (2016). Saudi EFL teachers' perceptions of the intermediate stage textbooks. Dirasat Educational Sciences, 43(2), 1103-1115. Retrieved from https://eis.hu.edu.jo/deanshipfiles/pub10089100710.pdf
Namaghi, S., Moghaddam, M. & Tajzad, M. (2014). Theorizing teachers' perspectives on an EFL textbook for public high schools of Iran: A grounded theory. English Language Teaching, 7(10), 123-129. doi:10.5539/elt.v7n10p123
Nikula, T. & Moate, J. (2018). Integrating everyday language with conceptual development across the CLIL pathway. Babylonia, The Swiss Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 21-25. Retrieved from http://babylonia.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/2018-2/Nikula___Moate.pdf
Rahimpour, S. (2013). TEFL textbook evaluation. Proceeding of the Global Summit on Education, (11-12), 764-772.
Richards, J. C. (2001). The Role of Textbooks in a Language Program. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Rosyida, E. (2016). Teachers' perceptions toward the use of English textbook. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa, 9(1), 43-54. Retrieved from https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/60406-EN-teachers-perceptions-toward-the-use-of-e.pdf
Suri, H. (2011). Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative research journal, 11(2), 63. doi: 10.3316/QRJ1102063
Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development. In A. Burns & J.C. Richards (Eds.). The Cambridge Guide to Pedagogy and Practice in Second Language Teaching (pp. 269-278). New York, United States of America: Cambridge University Press.
Tomlinson, B. (2013). Second language acquisition and materials development. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Applied linguistics and materials development (pp. 61-74). New York, United States of America: Bloomsbury.
Ulla, M. (2019). Western-published ELT Textbooks: Teacher Perceptions and Use in Thai Classrooms. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(3), 970-977. doi: 10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.3.13.970
Vellenga, H. (2004). Learning pragmatics from ESL & EFL textbooks: How likely? The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 8(2), 1-18. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1068091.pdf
Wen-Cheng, W., Chien-Hung, L. & Chung-Chieh, L. (2011). Thinking of the Textbook in the ESL/EFL Classroom. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 91-96. doi: 10.5539/elt.v4n2p91