RECURSOS EDUCATIVOS ABIERTOS Y PROCESOS DE ENSEÑANZA-APRENDIZAJE: UN ESTUDIO EXPLORATORIO (2021-2025)
Barre latérale de l'article
Contenu principal de l'article
Résumé
La Educación Abierta representa un campo de interés dentro de los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje, al centrarse en la colaboración para crear contenido, por lo que resulta necesario conocer su incidencia práctica frente a modelos de enseñanza tradicionales. El estudio ejecutó una revisión sobre la influencia de los Recursos Educativos Abiertos (REA) en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje dentro del contexto académico global en el periodo 2021-2025. Se utilizó la metodología de revisión sistemática basada en la declaración PRISMA, donde se mapearon las bases de datos y repositorios ERIC, Google Académico, La Referencia y Dialnet y seleccionaron 33 estudios para su análisis. Los resultados revelan que el impacto de los REA no residió en la mejora cuantitativa de las calificaciones, sino en diseñar herramientas útiles para reforzar habilidades cognitivas superiores y para el desarrollo de comunidades de aprendizaje colaborativo, lo que incide en el rediseño de métodos de enseñanza-aprendizaje encaminados a la creación de experiencias inclusivas y colaborativas.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.downloads##
Renseignements sur l'article
Numéro
Rubrique
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.
Responsabilité des auteurs-res:
Ils sont responsables des idées et des données présentées dans les manuscrits, de l'exactitude des informations, de la véracité des citations, des droits de publication de tout matériel inclus dans le texte et de la présentation du manuscrit dans le format requis par la Revue (modèle web). Un manuscrit envoyé à CHAKIÑAN ne doit pas avoir été publié auparavant, ni avoir été présenté sous la même forme à un autre support de publication.
Droits d'auteur:
Les articles publiés n’engagent pas le point de vue de la REVUE CHAKIÑAN. La revue est conforme à la politique de la licence Creative Commons Reconocimiento-No comercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0). Chaque auteur conserve ses droits sur l'article publié dans Chakiñan.
Déclaration de confidentialité
Les données personnelles et les adresses e-mail saisies dans ce magazine seront utilisées exclusivement aux fins énoncées par la publication et ne seront disponibles à aucune autre fin ou personne.
Comment citer
##plugins.generic.shariff.share##
Références
Bol, L., Esqueda, M. C., Ryan, D., & Kimmel, S. C. (2022). A Comparison of Academic Outcomes in Courses Taught with Open Educational Resources and Publisher Content. Educational Researcher, 51(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211052563
Boninger, F., Molnar, A., & Saldaña, C. (2020). Big Claims, Little Evidence, Lots of Money: The Reality Behind the Summit Learning Program and the Push to Adopt Digital Personalized Learning Platforms. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/summit-2020
Bradshaw, E., & McDonald, J. K. (2023). Informal Practices of Localizing Open Educational Resources in Ghana. IRRODL, 24(2), 18-36. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i2.7102
Burger, M., Zwane, D., Sanders, D., & Miller-Weber, K. (2025). Exploring open education resources for teaching pre-reading in the intermediate phase. Reading & Writing, 16(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v16i1.519
Chan, Y. K., Oh, J. E., & Ma, H. (2023). Using Open Educational Resources in Studio-Based Flipped Classrooms: Action Research in Video Production Learning. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00275-5
Disha, I., & Vollman, B. K. (2023). Open Educational Resources and Student Performance Trajectories: B Is Achievable, A Illusive. Open Learning, 38(4), 331-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2023.2190345
Eduafo, J. K., & Govender, D. W. (2024). The Community of Inquiry as a Tool for Measuring Student Engagement in Blended Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): A Case Study of University Students in a Developing Country. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 1-41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00306-9
Famaye, T., Abimbade, O., & Adisa, O. (2025). “AI is not just a robot; it’s more than a robot.”: Understanding children’s AI competencies in an AI literacy workshop. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 36(1), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.70725/183142fdpagp
Gagné, A., Wang, X., & Yusun, T. (2021). Building Bridges and Breaking Barriers: OER and Active Learning in Mathematics. OTESSA Journal, 1(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.18357/otessaj.2021.1.1.5
Griffiths, R., Mislevy, J., & Wang, S. (2022). Encouraging Impacts of an Open Education Resource Degree Initiative on College Students’ Progress to Degree. Higher Education, 84(5), 1089-1106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00817-9
Griswold, R. H. (2022). Access Is Not Enough: An Examination of OER Textbook Usage by English Composition Students at One Community College. Community College Enterprise, 28(2), 62-76. https://home.schoolcraft.edu/cce/28.2.62-76.pdf
Herrero-Álvarez, R., Arnay, R., Segredo, E., Miranda, G., & León, C. (2025). Using RoblockLLy in the Classroom: Bridging the Gap in Computer Science Education through Robotics Simulation. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 18, 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2024.3520329
Jaggars, S. S., Prieto, K., Rivera, M. D., & Folk, A. L. (2022). Using Affordable Course Materials: Instructors’ Motivations, Approaches, and Outcomes. Johns Hopkins University Press, 22(2), 305-334. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2022.0019
Kelly, A. E., Avila, B. N., & Schell, A. C. (2025). Students as Co-Authors: Achievement Emotions, Beliefs about Writing, and OER Publishing Decisions. Open Praxis, 17(1), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.17.1.745
Kotsopoulos, D. (2022). Developing an Undergraduate Business Course Using Open Educational Resources. CJSoTL, 13(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2022.1.10992
Lo, C. K., Ng, F., & Cheung, K. L. (2024). Sustainable Development and Formative Evaluation of Mathematics Open Educational Resources Created by Pre-Service Teachers: An Action Research Study. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00311-y
Mayer, J. (2023). Open Educational Resources (OER) Efficacy and Experiences: A Mixed Methods Study. Johns Hopkins University Press, 23(4), 773-798. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2023.a908701
Mercader, C., & Gairín, J. (2020). University teachers’ perception of barriers to the use of digital technologies: The importance of the academic discipline. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0182-x
Mubofu, C., & Kainkwa, E. (2023). University Lecturers’ Feelings, Awareness and Attitudes Towards Open Education Resources: Experience from Two Higher Learning Institutions in Tanzania. Open Praxis, 15(4), 328-341. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.15.4.555
Neill, J. (2024). Collaborative authoring using wiki: An open education case study. International Journal for Students as Partners, 8(1), 224-232. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v8i1.5417
Oelfke, A. L., Sadowski, J. A., Mathwig, C., Iremonger, C., Volkert, K., Dykman, E., Kuhl, L., & Baumann, A. (2021). Using Open Educational Resources at Viterbo University: Faculty and Student Feedback. IRRODL, 22(1), 78-90. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i1.4970
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura [UNESCO]. (2021). Recomendación sobre los Recursos Educativos Abiertos (REA). https://oer.pressbooks.pub/oeg2021/chapter/spanish/
Otto, D. (2021). Driven by Emotions! The Effect of Attitudes on Intention and Behaviour regarding Open Educational Resources (OER). Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2021(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.606
Pacheco, M. A., Sarmiento, A. V., Salazar, V. M., & Mendoza, L. R. (2022). Software libre vs Software privativo: Su implicación en la educación del siglo XXI. Ogma, 1(2), 62-73. https://doi.org/10.69516/16wtyc06
Rollag, S., & Gilpin, S. (2022). Open Pedagogy Practices in Teacher Education: Digital Spaces for Preservice Teachers’ Identities. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 22(4), 778-801. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/219882/
Sigama, K., & Kalema, B. M. (2022). A Model for MOOC Implementation in Areas of Low Bandwidth in Developing Countries. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 20(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.312182
Spencer, C., Angra, A., Dósa, K., & Jones, A. (2025). Undergraduate Learning Gains and Learning Efficiency in a Focused Open Education Resource. IRRODL, 26(2), 184-204. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v26i2.8117
Stallman, R. (2004). Software libre para una sociedad libre. Traficantes de Sueños.
Stone, B. W., & Brown, D. (2023). Anyone Can Learn Universal Design: An Interdisciplinary Course Centered around Blindness and Visual Impairment. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 36(1), 65-74. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1434985.pdf
Increasing the Open Education Resources Capacity of Precalculus Courses at York College and Queensborough Community College. (2023). International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 11(3), 554-569. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2634
Tila, D. (2024). Does OER Research-Based Learning Improve Performance: A Case Study from Students Enrolled in a Community College at City University of New York (CUNY). Journal of Education and Learning, 13(5), 245-259. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v13n5p245
Tur, G., Urbina, S., & Moreno, J. (2016). From OER to open education: Perceptions of student teachers after creating digital stories with Creative Common resources. BRAIN, 7(2), 34-40. https://www.edusoft.ro/brain/index.php/brain/article/view/594
Utha, K., Penjor, T., & Pem, U. (2024). The Impact of Physics Open Educational Resources (OER) on the Professional Development of Bhutanese Secondary School Physics Teachers. IJEDICT, 20(2), 40-54. http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewarticle.php?id=3304
Van den Berg, G., Mudau, P. K., Maphosa, C., Amponsah, S., Manditereza, B., van der Merwe, J., & Mongwe, S. (2023). Critical Reflection by Mature Students as Co-Developers of an Open Educational Resource in Foregrounding Their Learning. Journal of Learning for Development, 10(3), 316-332. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v10i3.1081
Versantvoort, M., & Schuwer, R. (2023). Towards Sustainable OER Practices: The Case of Bachelor Nursing in the Netherlands. Open Praxis, 15(2), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.15.2.542
Wang, Y., Li, M., Wang, X. S., Gildersleeve, A., & Turki, N. (2023). ATRP Kinetic Simulator: An Online Open Resource Educational Tool Using Jupyter Notebook and Google Colaboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(7), 2770-2775. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c01250
Wood, J. J., Wood, K. S., Rosenau, K. A., Cho, A. C., Johnson, A. R., Muscatello, V. S., Tien, I. S., Straus, J., Wolpe, S., Zeldin, A., Kazlauskas, K., & McLeod, B. D. (2025). Practitioner Adherence and Competence in MEYA, a Free Online Self-Instruction Program in Modular Psychotherapy and Counseling for Children’s Autism-Related Clinical Needs. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 55(2), 472-486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-023-06226-w
Wynants, S. (2022). Redesigning a Research Methods Course with Personalized, Interactive OER: A Case Study of Student Perceptions and Performance. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 22(1), 138-153. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v22i1.31706
Zaidi, R., Metcalfe, R., & Norton, B. (2022). Dual Language Books Go Digital: «Storybooks Canada» in French Immersion Schools and Homes. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 64-87. https://doi.org/10.37213/cjal.2022.31626