CARACTERIZACIÓN DE INSTRUMENTOS DE EVALUACIÓN DEL INGLÉS: UNA MIRADA A SU DISEÑO

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37135/chk.002.15.05

Keywords:

Evaluación, enseñanza, estudiantes, pruebas

Abstract

La evaluación tiende a estar asociada a estudiantes y aprendices; sin embargo, el término evaluación abarca tanto a profesores como estudiantes. Para entender el propósito de los instrumentos de evaluación del idioma es clave examinar a los diseñadores y sus preferencias. El objetivo de esta investigación es caracterizar 209 instrumentos de evaluación creados por profesores de inglés. Se trata de un estudio no experimental y descriptivo, que analiza los tipos de instrumentos, el nivel educativo, los sistemas y habilidades de la lengua inglesa, y el tipo y número de ítems. Dos de los más importantes hallazgos están relacionados con las preferencias que los profesores de inglés chilenos tienen hacia la evaluación tradicional y la tendencia a evaluar el vocabulario y la gramática; además, de preferir los test e ítems de completación de oraciones como los de uso más común.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Claudio DÍaz Larenas, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.

    Facultad de Educación, Departamento de Currículum e Instrucción

  • Alan Felipe Jara Díaz, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.

    Facultad de Educación, Departamento de Currículum e Instrucción

  • Yesenia Ester Rosales Orellana, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.

    Facultad de Educación, Departamento de Currículum e Instrucción

  • María José Sanhueza Villalón, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.

    Facultad de Educación, Departamento de Currículum e Instrucción

References

Alfallaj, F. & Al-Ahdal, A. (2017). Authentic Assessment: Evaluating the Saudi EFL Tertiary Examination System. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(8), 597-607. doi: 10.17507/tpls.0708.01

Allen, M., Noel, R., Rienzi, B. & McMillin, D. (2002). Outcomes Assessment Handbook. Long Beach, CA, USA: California State University, Institute for Teaching and Learning.

Astawa, I. N., Handayani, N. D., Mantra, I. B. N. & Wardana, I. K. (2017). Writing English language test items as a learning device: a principle of habit formation rules. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(3), 135-144. doi: 10.29332/ijssh.v1n3.67

Bachman, L. F. (2004) Statistical analyses for language testing. Cambridge, Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.

Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/20439383

Boud, D. (1990). Assessment and the promotion of academic values. Studies in Higher Education, 15(1), 101-111. doi:10.1080/03075079012331377621

Brindley, G. & Wigglesworth, G. (1997). Access: issues in English language test design and delivery. Sydney, Australia: Macquarie University, National Centre for English Language.

CTL Illinois. (2019). Improving Your Test Questions. Retrieved from https://citl.illinois.edu/citl-101/measurement-evaluation/exam-scoring/improving-your-test-questions

Coltrane, B. (2002). English language learners and high-stakes tests: An overview of the issues. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.

Coombe, C. (2018). An A to Z of second language assessment: How language teachers understand. Assessment Concepts. London, UK: British Council.

Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58 (4), 438-481. doi:10.3102/00346543058004438

Davis, B. G. (1993). Tools for Teaching. San Francisco, USA: Jossey-Bass.

Dickinson, D. K. & Tabors, P. O. (eds.). (2001). Beginning literacy with language: Young children learning at home and school. Baltimore, USA: Brookes.

Dikli, S. (2003) Assessment at a distance: traditional vs alternative assessments. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 2(3), 13-19. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1101956.pdf

Farhady, H. (2018). History of Language Testing and Assessment. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1–7. doi:10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0343

Frodden, M. C., Restrepo, M. I. & Maturana, L. (2009). Analysis of Assessment Instruments Used in Foreign Language Teaching. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 9(1), 171-201. Retrieved from https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/ikala/article/view/3146

Jacobs, L. C. & Chase, C. I. (1992). Developing and using Tests Effectively: A Guide for Faculty. San Francisco, USA: Jossey-Bass.

Kalajahi, S. A. R. & Pourshahian, B. (2012). Vocabulary learning strategies and vocabulary size of ELT students at EMU in Northern Cyprus. English Language Teaching, 5(4), 138-149. doi:10.5539/elt.v5n4p138

Kennedy, K. J., Chan, J. K. S., Fok, P. K. & Yu, W. M. (2008). Forms of assessment and their potential for enhancing learning: conceptual and cultural issues. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 7(3), 197-207. doi:10.1007/s10671-008-9052-3

Khoshsima, H. & Pourjam, F. (2014). A comparative study on the effects of cloze tests and open-ended questions on reading comprehension of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 2(7), 17-27. Retrieved from https://www.arcjournals.org/pdfs/ijsell/v2-i7/3.pdf

Law, B. & Eckes, M. (1995). Assessment and ESL. Manitoba, Canada: Peguis publishers.

Le Grange, L. L. & Reddy, C. (1998). Continuous Assessment: An Introduction and Guidelines to Implementation. Cape Town, South Africa: Juta legal and academic.

Martínez, J., Salinas, J. & Canavosio, A. (2014). La evaluación de la escritura en lengua extranjera (inglés) en el nivel superior: análisis de reportes docentes. [The evaluation of writing in a foreign language (English) in higher education: teachers’ reports analysis]. In Actas Congreso Nacional Subsede Cátedra Unesco UNR.

Matsuoka, W. & Hirsh, D. (2010). Vocabulary learning through reading: does an ELT coursebook provide good opportunities? Reading in a foreign language, 22(1), 56-70. doi:10125/66650

McKeachie, W. J. (1986). Teaching Tips. Lexington, Mass, USA: Heath.

Mertler, C. A. (2016) Classroom assessment: A practical guide for educators. London, UK: Routledge.

Ministerio de Educación de Chile (MINEDUC) (2019). En relación a la evaluación diferenciada. [In regards to differentiated evaluation]. Retrieved from https://www.ayudamineduc.cl/ficha/en-relacion-la-evaluacion-diferenciada-5

Sambell, K. & McDowell, L. (1998). The values of self and peer assessment to the developing lifelong learner. In Rust, C. (ed.). Improving student learning – improving students as learners (pp. 56-66). Oxford, GB: Oxford Center for Staff and Learning Development.

Schonlau, M., Gweon, H. & Wenemark, M. (2019). Automatic Classification of Open-Ended Questions: Check-All-That-Apply Questions. Social Science Computer Review, 20(10), 1-11. doi:10.1177/0894439319869210

Scully, D. (2017). Constructing multiple-choice Items to Measure higher-order thinking. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 22(4), 1-13. doi:10.7275/swgt-rj52

Spaan, M. (2006). Test and item specifications development. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3(1), 71–79. doi:10.1207/s15434311laq0301_5

Torres, J. & Perera, V. (2010). La rúbrica como instrumento pedagógico para la tutorización y evaluación de los aprendizajes en el foro online en educación superior. [The rubric as a pedagogical instrument for the tutoring and evaluation of learning in the online forum in higher education]. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, (36), 141-149. Retrieved from https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=36815128011

Wergin, J. F. (1998). Basic Issues and Principles in Classroom Assessment. In J. H. McMillan (ed.). Assessing Students' Learning; New Directions for Teaching and Learning, number 34 (pp. 5-17). San Francisco, USA: Jossey-Bass.

Published

2021-02-10 — Updated on 2021-12-01

Issue

Section

RESEARCH ARTICLES

How to Cite

CARACTERIZACIÓN DE INSTRUMENTOS DE EVALUACIÓN DEL INGLÉS: UNA MIRADA A SU DISEÑO. (2021). CHAKIÑAN, Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 15, 80-96. https://doi.org/10.37135/chk.002.15.05

Similar Articles

1-10 of 93

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.