THE REFLECTION OF TEACHING PRACTICE
Main Article Content
Abstract
The demands of the 21st century require teachers to prepare and assume a reflective attitude, to meet the academic expectations of today's students. The main objective of this work was to know teachers' perceptions about their reflection in teaching and how this process is carried out at the National University of Chimborazo. Thus, a purely qualitative - interpretive type of research was applied. An in-depth interview was conducted, structured with open questions among 12 teachers of the Education, Human Sciences, and Technologies Faculty. Dimensions and categories of analysis were established using the hermeneutical phenomenological method. The description and interpretation of the essence of experiences lived was carried out through the following phases: stage of assumptions clarification, collection of the experience lived through the interviews, the reflection about those experiences and, the writing-reflection stage of such experiences. The analysis of the teachers' thinking and their stories allowed to conclude that they have judgments, interpretations and assumptions that are not examined, discerned or analyzed, for several reasons, mainly because the self-assessment and co-assessment instruments used in the institution do not favor these reflection processes and because there are no available spaces for this purpose, considering as an alternative the formation of academic peers to study analytically and critically, theoretical and technical issues regarding teaching, for accurate decision making and the proper educational practice.
Downloads
Article Details
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
Responsibility of the authors:
The authors are responsible for the ideas and data collected in the manuscripts. They are additionally accountable for the fidelity of the information, the correction of the citations, the right to publish any material included in the text, and the presentation of the manuscript in the format required by the Journal (WORD template). A manuscript forwarded to CHAKIÑAN must not have been published before, nor must it have been submitted to another means of publication.
Copyright:
Published articles do not necessarily compromise the viewpoint of the CHAKIÑAN JOURNAL. The Journal is aligned to the policy of the licence de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-No comercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0). Each author retains the right to the paper published in the Chakiñan journal.
Privacy statement
The personal data and email addresses entered in this magazine will be used exclusively for the purposes stated by the publication and will not be available for any other purpose or person.
How to Cite
Share
References
Barba, A., Barba, J. J. & Martínez, S. (2016). La formación continua colaborativa a través de la investigación acción. Una forma de cambiar las prácticas en el aula. Contextos educativos, 9, 161-175.
Beauchamp, C. (2015). Reflection in teacher education: issues emerging from a review of current literature. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 16(1), 123-141.
Benade, L. (2015). Teachers’ Critical Reflective Practice in the Context of Twenty-first Century Learning. Open Review of Educational Research, 2(1), 42-54.
Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, USA: Jossey-Bass.
Brown, H. D. (2014). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. London, U. K.: Pearson.
Bryan, L. A. & Recesso, A. (2006). Promoting reflection among science student teachers using a web-based video analysis tool. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23, 31–39.
Buckworth, J. (2017). Issues in the Teaching Practicum. En G. Geng, P. Smith, y P. Black (eds.). The Challenge of Teaching, (pp. 9-17). (s.l): Springer, Singapore. Recuperado de https://researchers.cdu.edu.au/en/publications/issues-in-the-teaching-practicum
Caliskan, N., Kuzu, O. & Kuzu, Y. (2017). The Development of a Behavior Patterns Rating Scale for Preservice Teachers. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 130-142.
Chile, Organización de la Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2015). Informe Anual 2014 OREALC/UNESCO Santiago. Recuperado de http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/FIELD/Santiago/pdf/reporteanualfinal.pdf
Farrell, T. (2015). The practices of encouraging TESOL teachers to engage in reflective practice: An appraisal of recent research contribution. Language Teaching Research, 1–25.
Freidhoff, J. R. (2008). Reflecting on the affordances and constraints of technologies and their impact on pedagogical goals. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24, 117–122.
Fuster Guillen, D. E. (2019). Investigación cualitativa: Método fenomenológico hermenéutico. Propósitos y Representaciones, 7(1), 201-229.
García, F. & Martínez, R. (2017). Implicación de la educación en la sociedad del conocimiento, información y comunicación. CULCyT, 13(59), 358-362.
García, B., Loredo, J. & Carranza, G. (2008). Análisis de la práctica educativa de los docentes: pensamiento, interacción y reflexión. Revista electrónica de investigación educativa, 10(2008). Recuperado de https://redie.uabc.mx/redie/article/view/200.
Gonzales, E. (2013). Acerca del estado de la cuestión o sobre un pasado reciente en la investigación cualitativa con enfoque hermenéutico. Unipluriversidad, 13(1), 60- 63.
Hodgson, J. (2014). Surveying the wreckage: the professional response to changes to initial teachertraining in the UK. English in Education, 48, 7–25.
Imbernón, F. (2016a). La formación docente en momentos de cambios: ¿Qué nos dicen los profesores principiantes universitarios? Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 20(3), 467-492.
Imbernón, F. (2016b). Los retos educativos del presente y del futuro. La sociedad cambia, ¿y el profesorado? Revista Internacional de Formação de profesores, 1, 121-129.
Larrivee, B. (2000). Transforming Teaching Practice: Becoming the critically reflective teacher. Reflective Practice, 1(3), 293-307.
Ley Orgánica de Educación Superior (LOES). (2010). Ley No. 0. Registro Oficial, 298.
Martínez, J. (2011). Metodologías de la investigación cualitativa. Silogismo más que conceptos, 8(1), 27-38.
Martínez, M. (2014). Ciencia y arte en la metodología cualitativa. México: Trilllas.
Meierdirk, C. (2016). Is reflective practice an essential component of becoming a professional teacher? Reflective Practice, 17(3), 369-378. doi: 10.1080/14623943.2016.1169169
Moreno, A. (2015). Enfoques en la formación docente. Ra Ximhai, 11(4), 511-518.
Salazar, J., Salazar, P., Hidalgo, C., Villalobos, A., Marín, P., Coloma, C. & Oscar, R. (2013). Reflexión pedagógica y auto evaluación docente: ¿Simbiosis o depredación? Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 7(2), 147-155.
Salinas, J. (2004). Innovación docente y uso de las TIC en la enseñanza universitaria RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 1(1), 1-16.
Sein-Echaluce Lacleta, M. L., Fidalgo Blanco, Á. & García Peñalvo, F. J. (2013). Buenas prácticas de Innovación Educativa: Artículos seleccionados del II Congreso Internacional sobre Aprendizaje, Innovación y Competitividad, CINAIC 2013. Revista De Educación a Distancia, (44). Recuperado a partir de https://revistas.um.es/red/article/view/254011
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
Shulman, L. (2005). Conocimiento y enseñanza: Fundamentos de la nueva reforma. Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 9(2), 1-31.
Van Manen, M. (2003). Investigación educativa y experiencia vivida. Ciencia humana para una pedagogía de la acción y de la sensibilidad. Barcelona: Idea Books.
Vaughn, M. (2014). Adaptive teaching: reflective practice of two elementary teachers’ visions and adaptations during literacy instruction. Reflective Practice, 16(1), 43–60.
Veloquio, G. (2016). La formación permanente de los docentes ante el desafío de atender a la diversidad educativa. Revista nacional e internacional de educación inclusiva, 9(2),144-154.
Villalobos, J. & De Cabrera, C. M. (2009). Los docentes y su necesidad de ejercer una práctica. Revista de Teoría y Didáctica de las Ciencias Sociales, 14, 139-166.