POWER NETWORKS AND ECONOMY IN BERTRAND RUSSELL
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The concept of power is central to the social thought of Bertrand Russell and can be taken as the frame of reference for understanding his thinking outside the boundaries of analytic philosophy or the foundations of mathematics. This article of reflection analyzes Russell from the sciences of the spirit, where inevitably his concept of power plays a cardinal role. The analysis focuses on the role that the economy plays in its social thinking. For this we go through the typology in which Russell frames the economy, as a part of a system of power. It reviews the precisions that Russell establishes of the economy as a form that adopts the power, such as the sacerdotal, manifest or revolutionary power, among others. It shows that the economy is not a function of a specific form of power, nor is the general form of power, but a correlated sphere and in constant tension the revised forms of power. This process allows us to establish an economy-power relationship following a consistent systematization in terms of networks and which is articulated with its general framework of power system.
Downloads
Article Details
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
Responsibility of the authors:
The authors are responsible for the ideas and data collected in the manuscripts. They are additionally accountable for the fidelity of the information, the correction of the citations, the right to publish any material included in the text, and the presentation of the manuscript in the format required by the Journal (WORD template). A manuscript forwarded to CHAKIÑAN must not have been published before, nor must it have been submitted to another means of publication.
Copyright:
Published articles do not necessarily compromise the viewpoint of the CHAKIÑAN JOURNAL. The Journal is aligned to the policy of the licence de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-No comercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0). Each author retains the right to the paper published in the Chakiñan journal.
Privacy statement
The personal data and email addresses entered in this magazine will be used exclusively for the purposes stated by the publication and will not be available for any other purpose or person.
How to Cite
Share
References
Alchian, A. & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs and economic organization.
American Economic Review, 62, 777–795.
Blood, R. O. & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. The Sociological Quarterly, 2(2), 142-144.
Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. (1993). Power and wealth in a competitive capitalist economy. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 21(4), 324–353.
Foucault, M. (1988). El sujeto y el poder. Revista mexicana de sociología, 50(3), 3-20.
French, J. R., Raven, B. & Cartwright, D. (1959). The bases of social power. Classics of organization theory. Classics of organization theory, 7, 311-320.
Glock, H. J. (2008). What is analytic philosophy?. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Cambridge University Press.
Gramsci, A. & Vega, A. G. (1967). La formación de los intelectuales. DF, México: Grijalbo.
Griffin, N. (2003). The Cambridge Companion to Bertrand Russell. Londres, Inglaterra: Cambridge University Press.
Kilgarriff, P., Charlton, M., Foley, R. & O'Donoghue, C. (2019). The impact of housing consumption value on the spatial distribution of welfare. Journal of Housing Economics, 43, 118-130.
King, J.E. (2005). Bertrand Russell on Economics, 1889-1918. Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies, 25(1), 5-38.
King, J.E. (2007). Popular Philosophy and popular Economics: Bertrand Russell, 1919-70. Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies (1), 193-219.
Laclau, E. (1993). Poder y representación. Politics, theory and contemporary culture.
Lippincot, M. (1990). Russell's leviathan. Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies. 10(1), 6-29.
Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D. & Green, J. R.(1995). Microeconomic theory. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Oxford university press.
Palermo, G. (2014). The economic debate on power: a Marxist critique. Journal of Economic Methodology. 21(2), 175-192.
Rollins, B. C. & Bahr, S. J. (1976). A theory of power relationships in marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 619–627
Russell, B. (1917). Political ideals. Nueva York. Estados Unidos: The Century Co.
Russell, B. (1918). Proposed Roads to Freedom: Socialism, Anarchism, and Syndicalism. Londres, Inglaterra: George Allen & Unwin.
Russell, B. (1934). Freedom and Organization. Londres, Inglaterra: George Allen & Unwin.
Russell, B. (1938). Power: A New Social Analysis. Londres, Inglaterra: George Allen & Unwin.
Russell, B. (18 de agosto de 1945). The Bomb and Civilization. Forward, 29.
Russell, B. (1949). Authority and the Individual. Londres, Inglaterra: George Allen & Unwin.
Russell, B. (1951). New Hopes for a Changing World. Londres. Inglaterra: George Allen & Unwin.
Russell, B. (1975). The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell. Londres. Inglaterra: George Allen & Unwin.
Schilpp, P. (1944). The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell. Chicago: Northwestern University.
Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Oxford University Press.
Simpson, J., Farrell, A., Allison, K., Oriña, M. & Rothman, A. J. (2015). Power and social influence in relationships. APA handbook of personality and social psychology. 3(3), 393-420.
Thibaut, J. W. & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Willey.
Weber, M. (1992). Economía y sociedad. Ensayo de sociología comprensiva. DF, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Whitehead, A. N. & Russell, B. (1903). Principia Mathematica. Londres, Inglaterra: Cambrigde University Press.