PEER TUTORING IN MATHEMATICS LEARNING
Main Article Content
Abstract
Peer tutoring is viewed as an effective approach to mathematics instruction. However, careful planning and adaptation to the educational context must be undertaken for its implementation. Building on this foundation, future research could focus on developing a playful support system underpinned by an innovative methodology and digital tools. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of peer tutoring for mathematics teaching. To this end, the PRISMA protocol was applied, and inclusion criteria were set to encompass articles published in indexed journals from 2018 to 2024. A final sample of 14 empirical and meta-analytic studies was obtained. Characteristics such as approach, methodology, participant experiences, and emerging themes were considered in this systematic analysis. Overall, tutoring exerted a positive influence on mathematical performance, motivation, and self-regulated learning, with gender, educational level, and tutoring format serving as moderating factors. Peer tutoring is thus affirmed as an effective method, though meticulous planning and context-specific adaptation in secondary and tertiary education settings are required for its success.
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Responsibility of the authors:
The authors are responsible for the ideas and data collected in the manuscripts. They are additionally accountable for the fidelity of the information, the correction of the citations, the right to publish any material included in the text, and the presentation of the manuscript in the format required by the Journal (WORD template). A manuscript forwarded to CHAKIÑAN must not have been published before, nor must it have been submitted to another means of publication.
Copyright:
Published articles do not necessarily compromise the viewpoint of the CHAKIÑAN JOURNAL. The Journal is aligned to the policy of the licence de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-No comercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0). Each author retains the right to the paper published in the Chakiñan journal.
Privacy statement
The personal data and email addresses entered in this magazine will be used exclusively for the purposes stated by the publication and will not be available for any other purpose or person.
How to Cite
Share
References
Alegre-Ansuategui, F. J., Moliner, L., Lorenzo, G., & Maroto, A. (2018). Peer tutoring and academic achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 337-354. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79805
Alegre, F., Moliner, L., Maroto, A., & Lorenzo-Valentin, G. (2019a). Peer tutoring and mathematics in secondary education: literature review, effect sizes, moderators, and implications for practice. Heliyon, 5(9), 2-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02491
Alegre, F., Moliner, L., Maroto, A., & Lorenzo-Valentin, G. (2019b). Peer tutoring in algebra: A study in Middle school. Journal of Educational Research, 112(6), 693-699. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2019.1693947
Alegre, F., Moliner, L., Maroto, A., & Lorenzo-Valentin, G. (2019c). Peer tutoring in mathematics in primary education: a systematic review. Educational Review, 71(6), 767-791. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1474176
Alegre, F., Moliner, L., Maroto, A., & Lorenzo-Valentin, G. (2020). Academic Achievement and Peer Tutoring in Mathematics: A Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Education. SAGE Open, 10(2), 2-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020929295
Atkins, K., Dougan, B. M., Dromgold-Sermen, M. S., Potter, H., Sathy, V., & Panter, A. T. (2020). “Looking at Myself in the Future”: how mentoring shapes scientific identity for STEM students from underrepresented groups. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 2-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00242-3
Baiduri, B. (2017). Elementary school students’ spoken activities and their responses in math learning by peer-tutoring. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 145-160. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.10210a
Barahona, E., Padrón, Y. N., & Waxman, H. C. (2023). Classroom observations of a cross-age peer tutoring mathematics program in elementary and middle schools. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 515-532. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12983
Barquero, W. G. (2022). Análisis PRISMA como metodología para revisión sistemática: una aproximación general. Saúde Em Redes, 8(1), 339-360. https://doi.org/10.18310/2446-4813.2022v8nsup1p339-360
Bastart, C., & Flores, M. (2024). A Peer Tutoring Program for Mathematical Problem-Solving. Revista Electronica de Investigacion Educativa, 26(e22), 2-16. https://doi.org/10.24320/REDIE.2024.26.E22.5760
Bingölbali, E., & Coskun, M. (2016). A proposed conceptual framework for enhancing the use of making connections skill in mathematics teaching. Egitim ve Bilim, 41(183), 233-249. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2016.4764
Boaler, J. (2008). Promoting “relational equity” and high mathematics achievement through an innovative mixed-ability approach. British Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 167-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701532145
Chacón-Vargas, E. (2022). Peer Tutoring and Its Impact on Academic Performance in a University Mathematics Course. Revista Electronica Educare, 26(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.26-1.20
Diana, N., Suryadi, D., & Dahlan, J. A. (2020). Analysis of students’ mathematical connection abilities in solving problem of circle material: Transposition study. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 829-842. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.689673
Dunn, M. E., Shelnut, J., Ryan, J. B., & Katsiyannis, A. (2017). A systematic review of peer-mediated interventions on the academic achievement of students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 40(4), 497-524. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2017.0022
Durán, D., Torró, J., & Vilà, J. (2003). Tutoria entre iguals: un mètode d’aprenentatge cooperatiu per a la diversitat: de la teoria a la pràctica. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Hendricks, W., Olawale, B. E., & Saddiq, K. (2024). An Investigation of High School Preservice Teachers’ Self-Efficacy in Teaching Mathematics. Education Sciences, 14(11), 2-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111262
Holmquist, C., & Sundin, E. (2020). Is there a place for gender questions in studies on entrepreneurship, or for entrepreneurship questions in gender studies? International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 89-101. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-05-2019-0091
Hudson, B. (2018). Powerful knowledge and epistemic quality in school mathematics. London Review of Education, 16(3), 384-397. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.16.3.03
Ineval. (2023). Ineval presentó los resultados de la evaluación Ser Estudiante 2023. https://acortar.link/yBHRp4
INNE. (2023). PISA 2022 en España. https://acortar.link/G9CnXd
Jozwik, S. L., Freeman-Green, S., Kaczorowski, T. L., & Douglas, K. H. (2021). Effects of Peer-assisted Multimedia Vocabulary Instruction for High School English Language Learners. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 37(1), 82-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2020.1723153
Karakus, M., Tlessov, A., Hajar, A., & Courtney, M. (2024). Illuminating the shadows: the role of private supplementary tutoring on student math performance in PISA 2022. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 12(1), 2-29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-024-00228-5
Kromminga, K. R., & Codding, R. S. (2024). The impact of intervention modality on students’ multiplication fact fluency. Psychology in the Schools, 61(1), 329-351. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23054
Mayerhofer, M., Lüftenegger, M., & Eichmair, M. (2023). Impact of a Mathematics Bridging Course on the Motivation and Learning Skills of University Students. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 9(2), 2-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-023-00224-0
Meléndez-Armenta, R. A., Rebolledo-Méndez, G., & Huerta-Pacheco, N. S. (2022). Typifying Students’ Help-Seeking Behavior in an Intelligent Tutoring System for Mathematics. Ingeniería e Investigación, 42(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v42n2.84495
Moeyaert, M., Klingbeil, D. A., Rodabaugh, E., & Turan, M. (2021). Three-Level Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Data Regarding the Effects of Peer Tutoring on Academic and Social-Behavioral Outcomes for At-Risk Students and Students with Disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 42(2), 94-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932519855079
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 6(7), 336-341. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Moliner, L., Alegre, F., & Lorenzo-Valentín, G. (2022). Peer Tutoring and Math Digital Tools: A Promising Combination in Middle School. Mathematics, 10(13), 2-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10132360
Nasir, R., Fadzli, N., Rusli, S. A., Kamaruzzaman, N. S., Sheng, N. N., Mohammad, V. Y., & Shukeri, N. H. (2023). Peer tutoring learning strategies in mathematics subjects: Systematic literature review. European Journal of Educational Research, 12(3), 1407-1423. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.3.1407
Niyazova, G. B., Utemov, V. V., Savina, T. N., Karavanova, L. Z., Karnaukh, I. S., Zakharova, V. L., & Galimova, E. G. (2022). Classification of open mathematical problems and their role in academic achievement and motivation of students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(8), 2-11. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/12265
Plaza, J. (2023). Tutoría entre iguales: una alternativa didáctica enfocada en mejorar el rendimiento académico en Matemáticas. Revista Iberoamericana de Investigación en Educación, 7, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.58663/riied.vi7.122
Rethlefsen, M. L., Kirtley, S., Waffenschmidt, S., Ayala, A. P., Moher, D., Page, M. J., Koffel, J. B., & PRISMA-S Group. (2021). PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 2-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z
Roque Herrera, Y., Ángel, P., Moral, V., Santiago, I. I., García, A., María, I., Zagalaz, L., & Iv, S. (2018). Metacognition and autonomous learning in higher Education. Educación Médica Superior, 32(4), 293-302. http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/ems/v32n4/a023_1480.pdf
Ruiz, J., Francisco, P., Guillén-Gámez, D., Colomo-Magaña, E., & Sánchez-Vega, E. (2023). Effectiveness of the Flipped Classroom in the Teaching of Mathematics in an Online Environment: Identification of Factors Affecting the Learning Process. Effectiveness of the Flipped Classroom Online Learning Journal, 27(2), 304-323. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1393112.pdf
Schwerin, B., Espinosa, H. G., Gratchev, I., & Lohmann, G. (5 al 8 de diciembre de 2021). Enhancing maths teaching resources: Topic videos and tutorial streaming development. 9th Research in Engineering Education Symposium and 32nd Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference, Perth, Australia. https://doi.org/10.52202/066488-0004
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Marshak, L. (2012). Peer-Mediated Instruction in Inclusive Secondary Social Studies Learning: Direct and Indirect Learning Effects. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 27(1), 12-20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00346.x
Tang, S., Irby, B. J., Tong, F., & Lara-Alecio, R. (2021). The Effects of Cooperative, Collaborative, and Peer-Tutoring Strategies on English Learners’ Reading and Speaking Proficiencies in an English-Medium Context: A Research Synthesis. SAGE Open, 11(4), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211060823
Tătar, C. F., Tătar, M. I., Pénzes, J., & White, G. W. (2023). How Gender, Culture, and Economy Influence Field of Study Preferences in Higher Education: Exploring Gender Gaps in STEM, AHSS, and Medicine among International Students. Sustainability, 15(22), 2-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152215820
Vázquez, I. M., & Blanco-Blanco, Á. (2019). Sociocognitive factors associated with the choice of scientific-mathematical studies. A differential analysis by genre and course in Secondary Education. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 37(1), 269-286. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.37.1.303531
Vygotzky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wright, P., Fejzo, A., & Carvalho, T. (2022a). Challenging inequity in mathematics education by making pedagogy more visible to learners. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(2), 444-466. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1775320
Wright, P., Fejzo, A., & Carvalho, T. (2022b). Progressive pedagogies made visible: Implications for equitable mathematics teaching. Curriculum Journal, 33(1), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.122
Young, M. (2013). Overcoming the crisis in curriculum theory: a knowledge-based approach. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(2), 101-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.764505
Zaldívar, A., Nava, L., & Lizárraga, J. (2018). Influencia de la tutoría en el aprendizaje de Matemáticas. Perspectiva del estudiante. Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 8(16), 493-515. https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v8i16.355