The post-neoliberal South American development

Contenido principal del artículo

Santiago Carranco Paredes

Resumen

This study addressed the triangular relations between Latin America, Beijing and Washington in the last 15 years using a process tracing technique on the economic and political models of the region. It specifically focused on the South American development during the post-Washington Consensus era, as well as the expanding influence of China over this region. The aim of this paper was to transmit the idea that the failure of neoliberalism in the 90s together with the expansionism of China have shaped the contemporary political and economic arena among the countries of South America. This work could help to understand the historical process of the construction of develop paradigms on the region and its impact on the society.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.downloads##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.noStats##

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Carranco Paredes, S. (2018). The post-neoliberal South American development. Chakiñan, Revista De Ciencias Sociales Y Humanidades, 5, 18-39. https://doi.org/10.37135/chk.002.05.02
Sección
ARTÍCULOS DE INVESTIGACIÓN

Cómo citar

Carranco Paredes, S. (2018). The post-neoliberal South American development. Chakiñan, Revista De Ciencias Sociales Y Humanidades, 5, 18-39. https://doi.org/10.37135/chk.002.05.02

##plugins.generic.shariff.share##

Referencias

- Banco Central del Ecuador. (2003). Información Económica. Quito: Banco Central del Ecuador. Retrieved in January 2017, retrieved from http://www.bce.fin.ec/index.php/informacion-estadistica-1.

- Banco Central del Ecuador. (2014). Estadísticas Macroeconómicas. Quito: Banco Central del Ecuador.

- Becker, M. (2011). Correa, Indigenous Movements, and the Writing of a New Constitution in Ecuador. Latin American Perspectives, 2(1), 47-62.

- Berriosa, R, Marakb, A, & Morgensternc, S. (2011). Explaining hydrocarbon nationalization in Latin America: Economics and political ideology. Review of International Political Economy, 18(5), 673-697.

- Cavallo, Domingo. (2004). Argentina and the IMF During the Two Bush Administrations. International Finance, 7(1), 137-150.

- Cepal. (2015). Cepal Stats. Retrieved from http://interwp.cepal.org/cepalstat/WEB_cepalstat/Portada.asp?idioma=e

- Correa, R. (October 13, 2014). Rafael Correa: El Socialismo del XXI, son principios no modelos. Reto Peru. (J. Lanata, Entrevistador). Retrieved in January, de https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYHV6eagENk

- Dieterich, H. (2003). Three Criteria in the Definition of a Socialist Economy. Revista Internacional de Filosofía Iberoamericana y Teoría Social, 8(20), 117-132.

- Do Alto, H. (2008). La revolución de Evo Morales o los caminos sinuosos de la refundación de Boliva. En F. Gaudichaud (Ed.), El volcán Latinoamericano Izquierdas, movimientos sociales y neoliberalismo (pp. 164-183). Paris: Textuel.

- Ellsworth, B. 2. (20 de Abril de 2015). Venezuela recibe 5.000 Millones por nuevo préstamo de China. Reuters.

- Francoise, L. (2013). From foreign trade to international investment: a new step in China's integration with the world economy. Springer Econ Change Restruct, 46(1), 25-43.

- Hurrell, A. (2006). Hegemony, liberalism and global order: what space for would-be great powers? International Affairs, 82(1), 1-19.

- INE, C. d. (2007). Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Bolivia. Retrieved in January 2017, from http://www.ine.gob.bo/

- Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censo. (2014). Indicadores laborales. Quito: INEC.

- Jaramillo-Jassir, M. (2012). Populism and democratic consolidation during Rafael Correa's administration. Is it possible to ensure democracy through populism? Reflexión Política, 142-153.

- León-Manriquez, J., & Hearn, A. (2011). China Engages Latin America: Tracing the Trajectory. (1 ed.). London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

- Manriquez, J., & Alvarez, L. (2014). 'Mao's steps in Monroe's backyard: towards a United States-China hegemonic struggle in Latin America? Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 9(27), 9-27.

- Navarro, R. (2015). La exitosa política económica de Kirchner. El Chileno.

- Nazmi, N. (2001). Failed Reforms and Economic Collapse in Ecuador. The Quartery Review of Economic and Finnance, 41(1) 727-735.

- Oliva, C. (2010). Argentina’s Relations with China Opportunities and Challenges. En A. H. Fernández (Ed.), Latin America Facing China South-South Relations beyond the Washington Consensus (pp. 113-129). Ney York: Berghahn Books.

- Opec. (2015). OPEC, Venezuela. Retrieved in January 2017, from http://www.opec.org/opec_web/en/about_us/171.htm

- Ortiz, F. (2015). China, Latin America and the environment. Retrieved in July 2015, from http://dialogochino.net/yasuni-silent-investment/

- Panizza, F. (2009). Contemporary Latin America Development and Democracy beyond the Washington Consensus. New York: Zed Books.

- Philips, N. (2011). Re-ordering the Region? China, Latin America and the Western Hemisphere (Review). European Review of Latin American Studies 90(1), 89-99.

- Poveda, P. (2010) Latin America Facing China South-South Relations beyond the Washington Consensus. New York: Berghahn Books.

- Quincy, S. (2011). If Not Now, When? Reflections on Socialism in the 21st Century. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 22(3), 57-72.

- Ramirez Gallegos, F. (2011). Political Change, State Autonomy, and Post-Neoliberalism in Ecuador. Latin American Perspectives, 20(1), 1-15.

- Rangel, R., & Soto Reyes, E. (2012). El Consenso de Washington: la instauración de las políticas neoliberales en América Latina. Política y Cultura, 37(1), 35-64.

- Rhys, J. (2010). China’s Global Expansion and Latin America. Latin American Studies, Cambridge University Press, 42(1), 809–837.

- Richard, F. (1990). What Washington means by policy reforms (comment). In J. Williamson (Ed.), Latin American Adjustment How much has happened? (pp. 21-24). Washington: Institute for International Economics.

- Rowan, M. (2003). Bolivia y el “Consenso de Washington” se desentienden. Economía Hemeroteca, 8(20).

- Rudd, K. (2015). Are China and the US doomed to conflict? Colorado: TED talks.

- SENPLADES. (2009). Plan Nacional para el Buen Vivir 2009-2013. Quito: SENPLADES.

- Silva, S. (2015). The boom and crisis of the Convertibility Plan in Argentina. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 3(35), 325-342.

- Svampa, M. (2008). Argentina, del que se vayan todos a la exacerbación de lo nacional-popular. En F. Gaudichaud (Ed.), El volcán Latinoamericano Izquierdas, movimientos sociales y neoliberalismo (pp. 231-250). Paris: Textuel.

- Torres, D. (2015). Venezuela tiene el doble de ministerios que otros países. El Universal.

- Toussaint, E. (2003). “La crisis de la deuda en América Latina en los siglos XIX y XX”. Seminario Internacional “América Latina y el Caribe: salir del impase de la deuda y del ajuste” Brusels.

- Uquillas, C. (2007). "El outsourcing en el Ecuador”. Observatorio de la Economía Latinoamericana.

- Urdinez, F. (2014). The Political Economy of the Chinese Market Economy Status given by Argentina and Brazil. Ciencias Sociais-Universidade de São Paulo.

- Villavicencio, F. (2013). Ecuador Made in China (1st ed.). Quito: American institute for democracy.

- Williamson, J. (1990). Latin American Adjustment. Washington: Institute for International Economics.

- World Bank. (2014). Global Economic Monitor (GEM) Commodities. . Retrieved in January from http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=global-economic-monitor-(gem)-commodities#

- Wu, F., & De Wei, K. (2014). From Financial Assets to Financial Statecraft: the case of China and emerging economies of Africa and Latin America. Journal of Contemporary China, 89(23), 781-803.