LABOR CONTEXT IN ECUADOR IN THE 1930s: ACTIVE ECONOMIC POPULATION, LEGAL CONTEXT AND MINIMUM WAGES
Número 19 / ABRIL, 2023 (19-37) 184
The data on the economic active population in
Ecuador during the 1930s are somewhat obscure
because there are no exact references to processes
and organized by the central government in
the form of national censuses. Thus, the data
presented are approximations based on local
projections. The National Economic Planning
and Coordination Board calculated that by 1962
32% of the population could be considered
economically active.
Given the total absence of ocial data, we have
chosen to take this rst estimate and extrapolate
it for the 1930s. By 1930, approximately 14%
of the population lived in urban centers, that is,
more than 20,000 inhabitants (Bethell 1998: 31).
Extrapolating these numbers, around 116,480
people worked in the urban economy, and
around 715,520 in the rural economy. De la Torre
(1993) estimates that in 1936, 55% of the Quito
population was marginally employed: 10.4%
were day laborers, 23.5% were independent
workers, and 21.1% domestic workers. Public
sector workers represented 16.6% in 1936
(Naranjo, 2017).
According to Linda Alexander Rodríguez
(1992), it is known that half of the population
was indigenous, who led a sedentary life, with
feeding processes based on grains and tubers,
they exchanged their tissues for cow’s milk,
goats or cows, for meat, poultry or sheep wool
(Banco Central del Ecuador 1940).
This part of the population lived in a labor context
that arose from the Huasipungo, a space of land
that was rented for its production that served as
a livelihood for families and communities. The
concertaje system worked in a common way
in rural sectors, especially in the Ecuadorian
highlands, generating the isolation of rural sectors
from the local and international market. This
part of the economically active population was
outside domestic consumption and commercial
exchange because they interchanged products
and were clients of the same products that they
cultivated or traded.
In the northern central Sierra, which includes
the provinces of Chimborazo, Tungurahua,
Cotopaxi, Pichincha and Imbabura, the hacienda
system was the base on textile and agricultural
production becoming the main source of income
for workers, and the main source of industrial
development. Creamer (2018) argues that in the
1920s, a textile boom developed which founded
the bases for the type of industry that was going
to grow in the region, the main representative
cases are the Haciendas in Otavalo and the
Valley of Los Chillos (Saint-Geours 1994).
The indigenous were the essential mass of the
peasantry, as an active part at the hacienda.
After the indigenous were the day laborers,
small owners and artisans. Then, the mestizos:
merchants, carriers, employees, urban artisans.
And nally, there are the whites of the city. In
1930, Indians were no longer considered the
same way than in 1875. With a certain level
of democratization of society, “a State more
coherent national, international ideological
movements and the birth of indigenism, the
Ecuadorian Indian ceases to be a simple illiterate
labor force” (Saint-Geours 1994: 168).
The other twenty-ve percent of the population
was made up of wage workers and farmers,
who were immersed in internal trade. The
remaining percentage of the economically
active population was made up of public sector
workers, merchants, industry owners, renters,
who actively participated in the local market.
This percentage of the population was also
related to the external sector, that is, they were
those who consumed imported goods and those
who produced export goods.
The purchasing power of the economically
active population also varied according to the
labor group. From the rst group, there is no
more information because the population was
involved in the exchange and commercialization
system under the barter system. Due to the
absence of primary data and the complexity
of making calculations based on commercial
exchange and not on the monetary value of a
job, it is impossible to calculate exact amounts.
In this sector, there is only a qualitative
assessment of the social and labor conditions