INFORMATIVE PRODUCTION OF THE WRITTEN PRESS IN ECUADOR FROM A HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE
Número 17 / AGOSTO, 2022 (23-39) 32
over information that contributes to the social
and political debate of daily events. Indeed, the
quantitative survey says that, mainly in the daily
El Extra the indicator overrepresentation of
reality predominates, which is explained by the
insistence on crime report and, specically, it is
manifested in the section on court facts.
All this adds up a contextual factor of a regional
nature: the participants in the focus group
explain how the peculiarities of the Ecuadorian
mountains and coast have marked their
journalistic routines. Among the aspects that
appear is the allusion to more open audiences,
in the case of the coast, and others more closed,
in the case of the mountains. The following two
quotes illustrate it in a better way:
As for people in Esmeraldas, so they see
me with the camera and they say to me:
miss, miss come on, we want to tell you
everything that happened! They made me
sit down, family members surrounded me,
told me when the deceased was born, why
the accident, what they were going to do,
that they are asking for justice, that they
... then, I left the place with a more than
complete note of what that I needed; but
why? Because the crime report is seen in
Esmeraldas, for example, it can tell you
that it helps with human rights because it
helps people to become visible a problem
and maybe they can receive some legal
help. (VE03, personal communication,
April 2021)
How the work develops in the dierent
areas or in the zone where we are is very
dierent, for example, I remember that
I once did a coverage in an indigenous
execution, we arrived at a place, they
received us well; but…we went to the other
community and they beat us, for example,
so that marks a lot. (GLO4, personal
communication, April 2021)
When considering that the press’s discourse is
to a certain extent a social one, the dierences
in information production are appreciated
according to the place where the events happen.
According to this, other investigations explain
(Arteaga and Arzuaga 2015; Browne et al. 2013)
the link between journalistic productions and the
context. In their approaches, the authors start
by pointing out how vital is to understand and
recognize the social and cultural codes of the
scenarios where the events occur.
Such recognition enables the construction
of narratives that attend to certain cultural
representations and, therefore, will have better
chances of connecting with their audience
Concerning this, Campuzano & Guerrero
(2019) say that the journalistic narratives need
a hermeneutic process where “the other and
reality are perceived, analyzed, interpreted and
understood through a communicative exercise
where practices, languages and diverse aspects
of reality are decoded” (Campuzano & Guerrero
2019: 10).
Along the same lines, it is proposed to analyze
the role of the media as producers of information
under a double criterion: on the one side, a
sociological order, the need to review factors
on social demands; and, on the other side, an
organizational type criterion, focused on the
motivations and the processes of construction of
the information agenda (Wolf 1987 as cited in
Browne et al. 2013).
Among the characteristics that stand out are
the way they appear constrained between
the needs of the conjuncture in the face of a
journalism that prioritizes a respectful agenda
of the Human Rights. In this context, there is a
very subtle question of journalistic productions,
considering that there are many requirements
to be met in order to reach a clear position of
the press vis-à-vis the Human Rights. For this
purpose, journalists agree on the necessary
recognition and analysis of the Communication
Law, the value of empathy, the contrasting of
sources and the role of Communication careers
in professional training processes.
Under these conditions, how can a perspective
of Human Rights be shown in the written
media? how have relations been manifested in
condition of superiority or inferiority? Faced
with this question, the participants in the focus
group express, on the one hand, there are no such
dealings, what has happened is the production
of news content, conditioned by economic
interests, specically by advertising patterns,
which mark what kinds of facts and actors have