109
/ Número 9 /
DICIEMBRE, 2019
(109-123)
Número 9 / DICIEMBRE, 2019 (109-123)
FLICKERING BODIES: MAPPING
MULTICULTURALISM AND INSURGENT
CITIZENSHIP IN WAYDE COMPTON’S
BLACK VANCOUVER
CUERPOS PARPADEANTES:
CARTOGRAFIANDO
MULTICULTURALISMOS Y CIUDADANÍA
INSURGENTE EN EL VANCOUVER
NEGRO DE WAYDE COMPTON
Fernando Pérez García
UO189253@uniovi.es
Recibido:
18/03/2019
Aceptado:
05/06/2019
110
/ Número 9 /
DICIEMBRE, 2019
(109-123)
Número 9 / DICIEMBRE, 2019 (109-123)
Abstract
We live in a moment of hardening of nationalist discourses against
immigration and racial minorities. In this conservative climate, Canada
prevails as a benchmark for multicultural integration. However, there are
voices within the nation that question this image of harmony. The case of
the Black Vancouver community has not yet been studied in depth in
this regard. This article of reflection aims to contribute to the debate on
the relations of the nation-state and subaltern groups, and how they
manifest themselves in the multicultural city. Vancouver has been chosen
as a paradigmatic space because of its transcultural character built on
indigenous lands. The object of study was the literature of Wayde Compton
author and black activist of the city. Stemming from theories of the socio-
spatial dialectic of Edward Soja and Leonie Sandercock, this article
analyses the connection between the city, its representation in literature and
its effects on social relationships. The work of Compton and its parallelism
with the geo-history of Vancouver and subaltern ethnic communities were
analysed. The result reaches a reading of Vancouver as a (post)colonial city
and space of subaltern multiculturalism, regarding the official Canadian
model, and colonialism that has made invisible to the Black Vancouver and
the indigenous communities.
Keywords: Black, Vancouver, literature, space, multiculturalism.
Resumen
Vivimos en un momento de endurecimiento de discursos nacionalistas sobre
inmigración y minorías raciales. En este clima conservador, Canadá
prevalece como referente de integración multicultural, sin embargo,
existen voces dentro de la nación que cuestionan esta imagen de armonía.
El caso de la comunidad negra en Vancouver aún no ha sido estudiado en
profundidad en este aspecto. Este artículo de reflexión pretende contribuir
al debate sobre las relaciones de la nación-estado y grupos subalternos y
cómo se manifiestan en la ciudad multicultural. Se ha escogido Vancouver
como espacio paradigmático por su carácter transcultural, construida
sobre tierras indígenas. El objeto de estudio fue la literatura de Wayde
Compton, autor y activista negro de la ciudad. Partiendo de teorías de la
dialéctica socio-espacial de Edward Soja y Leonie Sandercock, este artículo
analiza la conexión entre la ciudad, su representación en la literatura y sus
efectos en las relaciones sociales. Se analiza la narrativa de Compton y su
paralelismo con la geo-historia de Vancouver y comunidades raciales
subalternas. Como resultado, se llega a una lectura de Vancouver como
ciudad (post)colonial y espacio de multiculturalismo subalterno, frente al
oficial canadiense y al colonialismo que ha invisibilizado al Vancouver
Negro y a las comunidades indígenas.
Palabras clave: Negro, Vancouver, literatura, espacio, multiculturalismo.
FLICKERING
BODIES: MAPPING
MULTICULTURALISM
AND INSURGENT
CITIZENSHIP IN WAYDE
COMPTON’S BLACK
VANCOUVER
CUERPOS
PARPADEANTES:
CARTOGRAFIANDO
Y CIUDADANÍA
INSURGENTE EN EL
WAYDE COMPTON
FLICKERING BODIES: MAPPING MULTICULTURALISM AND INSURGENT CITIZENSHIP IN WAYDE COMPTON’S BLACK VANCOUVER
111
/ Número 9 /
DICIEMBRE, 2019
(109-123)
INTRODUCTION
Terminal City, Hollywood North, City of Glass.
These are just a few of the nicknames for the city
of Vancouver, some reflecting on its geohistory or
its architectural aesthetic. However, perhaps
Leonie Sandercock’s metaphor of the Mongrel
City better describes Vancouver as the urban space
in which difference, multiplicities and plurality
shall prevail over the fears of the so-called decline
of the Western Civilization (2013:2). In a time of
hardening nationalist discourses, it stands for
the possibility of building a community of
togetherness in difference, and whose identity is
multiple.
The forces of globalization are shaping the cities,
making them interconnected, re-structuring and
re-shaping them both economically and
demographically. It is the case of Vancouver as the
bridge between America and Asia through the
Pacific but also as a dividing line between Canada
and the United States through the 49th parallel. Its
status as a multiethnic, multiracial and culturally
diverse cosmopolis also comes with anxieties and
fears: psychological, economic, the fear of the
Other and of those deemed as un-belonging.
Canada stands as a benchmark when it comes to
integration and coexistence between different
cultures, yet there are some discordant voices
indicating otherwise.
The case of Vancouver’s Black community and
their claims have not yet been studied in-depth.
This article argues that the analysis of the literature
of these communities, their representation of the
city and their relationship with the urban history
can result in a form of creole multiculturalism
different from the state model. Although being
involved in “positive ways in addressing the
challenge of integrating migrants from different
cultures, engaging in the active construction of new
ways of living together” (Sandercock 2013:8), it is
essential to frame Vancouver in a racialized liberal
democracy to understand its cultural landscape
and spatial struggles.
Black presence in Vancouver is tightly related to
space. Space is emphasized by Compton and
other Black Canadian writers like George Elliott
Clarke, especially those spaces defined by
indigenous Black Canadian spaces that disrupt
the myths of the nation-state, i.e., the false
assumption that Canadian Blackness is recent
and of Caribbean origin.
Compton’s efforts on the recovery of Black
geohistory and cultural landscape in Vancouver
both through his literary production and the
foundation of the Hogan’s Alley Memorial
Project (H.A.M.P.) reinforces the idea that
“people invest places with social and cultural
meaning and [urban geohistory] can provide a
framework for connecting those meanings into
contemporary urban life” (Hayden 1995:78). He
goes beyond the task of recovering an invisible
history as he explores an emplotment within
meaningful interpretive geography [in which] the
present is researched for its insights in
reinterpreting the past and for the sites from
which to act to re-contextualize the future” (Soja
1996:192). His recovering of Hogan’s Alley
memory works to spatialize Black Vancouver’s
history.
Compton is known for his concern to recover and
re-map the invisibilised historic Black presence in
Vancouver, thus problematizing the given ideas of
state multiculturalism and foundational narrations
“in ways that question fixed ideas of nationhood,
identity and belonging (…) crucially rooted in the
textured urban spaces of Vancouver” (Leow
2012:49). This rootedness in the local context of
Vancouver is what makes Hogan’s Alley, the late
immigrant, multi-ethnic neighborhood a crucial
element in Compton’s work and Black Vancouver
history. If nations, as imagined communities,
assume apparent homogeneity of their members,
the racial, cultural and political tensions that
participate in the systemic hierarchy of citizens
expose the violence with which an artificially
created homogeneity is forced.
Wayde Compton has coined the term
Afroperipheralism to describe the situation of
Black Vancouver: the feeling of invisibility and
isolation on the margins of the Black diaspora,
the search for local roots and racialized spaces,
and at the same time rejecting modernist,
exclusive discourses and cultural politics and
those representations that cannot be applied in
the local context of Vancouver. This puts them
FLICKERING BODIES: MAPPING MULTICULTURALISM AND INSURGENT CITIZENSHIP IN WAYDE COMPTON’S BLACK VANCOUVER
112
/ Número 9 /
DICIEMBRE, 2019
(109-123)
in the uncomfortable situation between total
assimilation or writing against elision, but it also
provides an open space that allows more radical
experiments on identity.
METHODOLOGY
Through the lens of theories of urban space and
multicultural planning, this article of reflection
will analyze the problematic relation between the
city of Vancouver and the multiethnic minorities
shaping it. Stemming from the modernist urban
planning, the construction of fear of the Other and
insurgent citizenship have been involved in the
processes of urban renewal that extend this
inequality to the social space.
This article of reflection will analyze this relation
through the eyes of Wayde Compton, one of the
leading literary figures of the city and whose work
focuses on the Afroperipheral Black community
of Vancouver and the subversion of narrow
discourses on race and multiculturalism. Critical
reading of The Outer Harbour (2014) will prove
useful to analyze how subaltern cosmologies
disrupt the hegemonic understanding of space. In
this book, the city becomes another character
exploring identity, gentrification and racial issues
with a speculative dystopic tone that is sadly
becoming real in the current Vancouver constant
urban renewal and Indigenous land rights.
Edward Soja’s theories of space allow for the
understanding of Vancouver as a space that is
neither neutral nor a mere outcome of the socio-
historical and cultural events, but that it has also
played an active role in them:
all social relations remain abstract and
unrealized until they are concretely
expressed and materially and symbolically
inscribed in lived space [and they do so
through the social production of space,] a
continuous and contentious process that is
filled with politics and ideology, creativity
and destruction, and with the unpredictable
interplay of space, knowledge, and power.
(Soja 2003:275)
Another contribution of these geographers to the
theories of space was the idea that the role of urban
planning in the city has been to regulate and
discipline subjects through space, as an ordering
tool treating the city as a disordered, polluted
Other.
Multicultural planning theories show that in
multicultural contexts, there is always a
hegemonic culture whose narrative and practices
are embedded in the system and official narrative
in a more or less explicit way. These biases are
embedded in the legislative fabric of the state and
legitimized by their uncritical application. The state
reproduces these conditions of racial stratification
through its ideological and repressive apparatuses:
bureaucracy, legislation, social service agencies or
housing policies (Sandercock 2013).
Those public workers, urban planners and
developers part of the dominant culture and
political apparatus, rarely recognize dominant
cultural norms and practices that clash with other
coexisting cosmologies. These stories of progress
invisibilise the role of urban planning as a tool for
surveillance and control certain bodies in space,
struggling with counter-hegemonic practices.
While official multiculturalism favored the
preservation of ethnic culture, the neoliberal
policies increase the material conditions of
inequality for racialized minorities. The dominant
liberal ideology presents itself as neutral, adopting
non-white groups within the Eurocentric
framework. The symbolic celebration of cultural
difference has the effect of displacing claims of
exclusion by racialized communities.
On the other side there is a response to these
conceptions of space as a neutral entity. Through
coexistence and transcultural activism, citizens
articulate platforms like Militant Mothers of
Raymur or Hogan’s Alley Memorial Project
(Compton 2010) that can disrupt the dominant
perspective, claiming ownership or improvement
of their spaces.
Bearing this in mind, this article of reflection will
understand that the city inhabitants are “continually
produced and reproduced by the forms of the city
and that the form of the city is actively and
continually constructed (and de/reconstructed) by
FLICKERING BODIES: MAPPING MULTICULTURALISM AND INSURGENT CITIZENSHIP IN WAYDE COMPTON’S BLACK VANCOUVER
113
/ Número 9 /
DICIEMBRE, 2019
(109-123)
its citizens” (Epstein 1998:212-213).
This spatial approach will be completed with
Barbara Hooper’s notion (cited in Soja 1996) of
a representational practice of somatography: a
hierarchical differentiation of the flesh which
orders ambiguous substances of matter as political
meanings and territories. Thus, the body is turned
into a mediated space transformed by
representations and cultural interpretations, into a
social and lived space intervened by the workings
of power (Soja 1996:113). The body becomes a
subject of social discourse, an imaginary obsessed
with the fear of that which cannot be controlled,
with things that are out of place, polluting the city
and the spatial practices to lock or destroy these
elements.
Stemming from this theoretical framework of
socio-spatial dialectical theories of space and from
the role of racialization or somatography in the
configuration of the city and its racial trajectory,
this article of reflection will offer a contextual
background from which Compton’s work emerges.
After that, this article will analyze his latest work
and how it represents the transcultural relations in
and through the urban landscape of Vancouver.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
HOGAN’S ALLEY AND THE
RACIALISED CITYSCAPE
While Vancouver tops rankings of most-livable
cities and it is praised for its urban planning
model, Vancouverism, they do not mention the
B-side of urban renewal and the decline of multi-
ethnic working-class neighborhoods. Compton
addresses these issues and the situation of the
Black community, many members of which lived
in Hogan’s Alley, part of Strathcona in East
Vancouver. They paid the price of the razing of
their homes for the construction of the Georgia
and Dunsmuir viaducts in the late 1960s, part of
a project to build a freeway that was ultimately
stopped thanks to citizen’s protests:
Punning on the term ‘urban renewal,’ there
was a ‘Negro removal’ -the destruction of
the politically weakest community of a
city for a large modernist planning scheme,
portrayed as slum clearance. The city
might have been saved, but from the
perspective of the black community, this
part of the city was shamelessly sacrificed.
(Compton 2010:84)
Hogan’s Alley was a specific site of Black
Residence, but also home to Italians, Asians, First
Nations people, and others. It is more precise to
say that Hogan’s Alley had a Black community
within it, and one that was significant enough that
we can refer to the neighborhood itself as a
racially-identified space. It was a progressivist
space understood as a product of interrelations; a
sphere of possibility in which different trajectories
coexist and always under construction, in the
process of being made (Massey 2008). In what can
be called spatial capital, members of different
communities joined forces in SPOTA, an
interethnic, transcultural activist group to fight
back the cities’ campaign of hypersimulation to
present Strathcona as a slum. What was at stake
was not only their home but their very constitution
of being the ways they perceived space,
themselves and others, the modes of experience,
their sensibilities shaped by the urban experience.
Unluckily, by the time the project was canceled,
part of Strathcona, including Hogan’s Alley, had
already been razed.
As it has been mentioned above, the process of
somatography of Black bodies in Vancouver and
the destruction of Hogan’s Alley are key to
understand the vision of the city and its spatial-
cultural myths articulated by Compton in his
works, reshaping the future of Vancouver by re-
telling new stories about the past.
The reasons for the destruction of Hogan’s Alley
could be traced back to two complementary
discourses that worked together: fear-fueled
somatograpy and modernist notions of progress.
Fear can be understood as the spatial result of
power relations if we include if we include
Elizabeth Grosz’s point on the city’s form and
FLICKERING BODIES: MAPPING MULTICULTURALISM AND INSURGENT CITIZENSHIP IN WAYDE COMPTON’S BLACK VANCOUVER
114
/ Número 9 /
DICIEMBRE, 2019
(109-123)
structure as:
the context in which social rules and
expectations are internalized or habituated
in order to ensure social conformity or
position marginality at a safe or insulated
or bounded distance (ghettoization). This
means that the city must be seen as the
most immediately concrete locus of the
production and circulation of power.
(Grosz 1992:250)
In 1960s Vancouver, the demonized and racialized
Black bodies of the Hogan’s Alley residents
represented the pollution, the social unrest, crime
and the obstacle on the way of progress contributing
to the creation of this “common sense” (Omi &
Winant 2015:111).
Another approach was that the modernist idea of
progress and order over spatial chaos. Hogan’s
Alley cheap land, inefficient land use, older
housing stocks and working-class residents were
the characteristics the government needed to prove
that blighted areas existed in Vancouver to gain
access to NHA infrastructure funds (Lee
2007:392). This perspective corresponds with Jill
Wades vision about the long-standing housing
problem Vancouver suffers up to the present- day
due to the lack of affordable dwellings in Metro
Vancouver and the lack of middle-income
dwellings to house middle-income families (Wade
1994:48).
The acceptance of the modernist Eurocentric
discourse based on colonialist ideas of the Other,
supported by the process of somatography was
the basis for further action. The myth of the
construction of a modern city for everyone
allowed political actors to erase the Black presence
materially and symbolically from Hogan’s Alley
and deem it invisible for decades from the heart of
the modern metropolis.
After the razing of Hogan’s Alley, the Black
community dispersed throughout the city, which
contributed to the feeling of isolation and
invisibilisation, bringing a political vulnerability
as a consequence:
A scattering, an integration, partly forced,
partly wanted, has made for no place, no
sit, no centres residential or commercial,
no set of streets vilified or tourist-friendly,
and no provincial or federal riding that a
politician would see as black enough ever
to rate the wooing of a community vote.
(Compton 2010:105)
Compton’s work becomes this way a struggle of
memory against forgetting. Through his poetry, he
becomes an archeologist and an architect, re-
creating spaces for the readers to inhabit, with his
poems and prose reflecting on the urban landscape
and contemporary construction responding to
these non-places.
(POST)COLONIAL RE-
SPATIALISATIONS
The already mentioned somatography of Hogan’s
Alley and the invisibilisation of Black
Vancouverites become a crucial element in his
latest work, The Outer Harbour, through the
creation of fictional racialized spaces, imaginary
urban geography superimposed on the actual one
and manifesting the yearning to counter this
under-representation. This is reflected in the
Pauline Johnson Island subplot, which relates the
emergence of a volcanic island in the outer harbor
of the city, coming out of the sea. On this island
subplot, Compton visibilises the materiality of
racial exclusion in Vancouver, and how it affects
not only the Black community but is most virulent
against First Nations peoples in the region. The
emergence of the island reconfigured an already
racialized space. It altered the physicality of the
city, but it also brought to clear focus the legacy of
unjust geographies, the occupation of First
Nations unceeded lands, the marginal spaces of the
refugees, the racialized and the abject bodies
deemed unassimilable.
Ironically, the federal government claimed
possession and turned it into a protected zone, a
national site for research and names is after a
writer and performer popular in the late 19
th
century who was the daughter of a Mohawk chief
FLICKERING BODIES: MAPPING MULTICULTURALISM AND INSURGENT CITIZENSHIP IN WAYDE COMPTON’S BLACK VANCOUVER
115
/ Número 9 /
DICIEMBRE, 2019
(109-123)
of mixed ancestry and an English mother.
The trajectories taken by social interactions in
each space-time, are crucial in the process of
identity formation. A given moment, along with
the understanding and negotiation of the
surrounding space, history and the correlation of
forces, will lead to the construction of an individual
cosmology or a unique manner of relating to the
surrounding space-time. The resulting multiplicity
of cosmologies can be considered coexistent to the
extent that they share a physical space, but in the
field of socio-political practices, they might be
antagonistic.
Depending on the correlation of forces, one
cosmology or another will become hegemonic,
despite other insurgent cosmologies trying to stop
it, becoming entangled in the process (Harvey
2017:181). This interconnection can be seen in the
Pan-Indian activists that occupy Pauline Johnson
Island in The Outer Harbour. This group struggles
against a model of racialized liberal capitalist
democracy that tries to expand its cosmology of
accumulation of capital through the colonization
and commodification of new spaces (populated or
not) with the consequent disciplining of the space.
Pauline Johnson Island becomes a microcosm
where the colonization of British Columbia is
replicated. This formerly unpopulated space will
be claimed by the city council and the federal
government without even discussing if it should
remain First Nations land. In the present, cities
like Vancouver are not only multicultural insofar
as multiple races, cultures and ethnicities coexist,
but they continue to maintain a colonial present
through the discourses of fear and threat that
contain and control the different First Nations
peoples, on whose unceded lands the city of
Vancouver rises.
In this story, the main characters are Fletcher, an
Indian boy adopted by whites, and his girlfriend
Jean, who is pretty much Black. They decide to
gather some friend and organize “some kind of
intervention, occupation, (…) get in on the anti-
colonial ground (…) a country with a less than a
two-year timeline. Its ancient past was under the
ocean” (Compton 2014:34-36) echoing not only
the invisibilisation of Black history in Vancouver,
but also the settler colonialism, modernist planning
and urban renewal that shaped the city, as the
island shape seems unnatural, “as if it had been
designed rather than born [and soon] a pop can
will wash up on its shores and it will be officially
colonized” (Compton 2014: 36-37).
Jean sees their plan as “a kind of retort to the
Vancouver she has known (…) all the where- are-
you-froms and all the where-are-you- really-
froms; (…) being preemptively estranged (…) The
plan was something to capsize for” (Compton
2014:37).
Jean sees the opportunity to claim this island as an
open space where those racialized and estranged
bodies can build a new community, a new home
place of belonging non-existent in Vancouver.
Once in the island, she takes an empty bottle, folds
a drawing into it and buries the bottle with the
expectation of creating a new history, authentic
First Nations glyphs from one of the minor coastal
islands.
It does not take much time for the police to arrive
with helicopters moving ferociously fast, throwing
leaflets telling them literally how to surrender in a
place that makes them illegal by being there,
insurgent citizens not recognized by the other pole
of the power relation. Their mere presence in the
unclaimed island and their own recognition as
members of a unified community stranger to the
formal hegemonic citizenship problematizes the
dominant notion of citizenship as national identity
and the role of the nation-state as a form of
political community (Holston 1998:51). Parallel to
the trajectory of settler colonialism in Canada,
First Nations peoples were constructed as an
obstacle to progress that had to be destroyed,
either by assimilation or genocide, to gain access
to their lands and resources.
Fletcher tries to win some time for the press to
arrive by writing a message on the sand in what
appears to Jane as “gliding across a ballroom floor.
Soft shoe or Indian-style, she cannot decide.
Either. Both (…) The island first dance.” (Compton
2014:46) reflecting the hybrid and transcultural
social landscape of Vancouver, in which the
notion of formal and substantive citizenship is
continuously problematized, revealing the
paradoxes of the official foundational narrative of
the city.
FLICKERING BODIES: MAPPING MULTICULTURALISM AND INSURGENT CITIZENSHIP IN WAYDE COMPTON’S BLACK VANCOUVER
116
/ Número 9 /
DICIEMBRE, 2019
(109-123)
In the face of this defiance to the dominant
cosmology, the State response to discipline space
results in the police raid and the subsequent killing
of Fletcher, the insurgent leader. In Vancouver, the
small number of the Black community allowed
them to avoid the most virulent forms of systemic
racism, but the Chinese and First Nations did not
have the same luck (Compton 2010). In the case of
the First Nations peoples, not only were they
stripped from their ancestral lands, but their rituals
(which defied the cosmology of capital
accumulation) were prohibited and prosecuted,
even isolating them from certain professions and
mainstream Canadian legal services.
Even today, Indigenous peoples face a notorious
history of racial profiling and spatial violence.
Episodes like the Trans Mountain Pipeline crisis
in 2018 reveal the problematic accommodation of
Indigenous cosmologies within the dominant
frame. Over 150 First Nations and Chiefs signed a
treaty opposing the project and the exploitation of
their ancestral unceded lands. Indigenous rights
are depicted as an obstacle to (mainstream
Canadian) progress (Maynard 2017).
Pauline Johnson Island erupts. This climatic
eruption reflects the destruction of the subaltern
spaces and how the socio-spatial dialectic operates,
with the identity and the formation of space being
co-consecutive trajectories. The violent seizing of
unceded lands points to settler colonialism and the
failure of reconciliation policies in Canada. These
policies cannot be isolated from the geohistoric
context from which they arise, in a nation marked
by European colonization and expansion and the
maintenance of a colonial ideology that marks the
government and the hierarchy of space, indigenous
communities and institutions.
Reconciliation policies point to a possible future
of repairing past damages but always from the
maintenance of a settler cosmology and European
order. This does not mean a true reparation or
deconstruction of the geohistoric sedimentation
process, but the acceptance of a present that
maintains a colonial order and for which an
apology is meant to suffice. For Blacks and First
Nations peoples, reconciliation should only be the
beginning of a process to rethink the hierarchy of
space and institutions through colonial lenses
to argue that the idea of humanity is the fruit of
multiple perspectives and the European is just one
of them (Walcott 2016:76).
The Boom covers the next years after the violent
repression in Pauline Johnson’s Island, and as it
happened in the 60s, despite the protests and
commemoration events, the government decided
to rezone the area for private development,
ignoring the local life. In this case, to build a tower
of luxury condos called ARRIVAL in a sarcastic
reference that “boldly blends the pioneer spirit of
Canada’s heritage with 21
st
-century bravado”
(Compton 2014:109).
Colonizing an already inhabited and claimed island
is rewritten as a discovery, pioneering experience.
The only language that matters it is that of urban
development, mirroring the actual housing crisis
in Vancouver and its constant rezoning of the
cityscape to build more high-middle class
unaffordable housing while homelessness and
fentanyl-related death crisis rise in East Vancouver
(Pablo 2018). Real state plans replace words.
Despite the official recognition of cultural rights
of Indigenous populations within the national
political framework, these recognitions represent
a new language to speak of the same colonial
situation of dispossession of lands and resources.
The island becomes a symbolic one: the only
refuge from crime at this side of a fairytale castle
pit. A closed community with restricted access in
what used to be public space, now privatized. It
reflects the gradual change of public spaces into
security housing developments with clearly
demarcated borders, with walls and controlled
entries to prevent an alien invasion. The big
quartz glass towers are based on a design that
gives priority to vertical growth and excessive
concentration in the heart of the city sacrificing a
more open, horizontal and more human urban
space. It is also a response to the fear of the city
as fear of the Other, an implicit belief that safe
spaces can resolve social interactions. In the
worst case, even well-intended safe spaces can
deny and repress social difference and diversity
(Epstein 1998:211).
FLICKERING BODIES: MAPPING MULTICULTURALISM AND INSURGENT CITIZENSHIP IN WAYDE COMPTON’S BLACK VANCOUVER
117
/ Número 9 /
DICIEMBRE, 2019
(109-123)
HOLOGRAPHIC CITIZENSHIP
AND MULTICULTURALISMS
In the final story, The Outer Harbour, we are told
that Jamie Langenderbach creator of a Vancouver-
based live-action role-playing game called The
Secret Commonwealth after a centuries-old
Scottish guidebook about mythical creatures, is an
employee in Enfortech, a firm that develops non-
lethal crowd control devices and has ties with the
government. He is secretly using his game design
experience to create a paramilitary device, using
the live action role-playing game to test-run it.
The game uses “an imaginary spatialisation of the
Lower Mainland into ‘realms’ (…) divided into
warring factions with battles played through
Langenderbach’s algorithm. These imaginary
cantons are superimposed over the topography of
real-life Vancouver and its outlying suburbs”
(Compton 2014:161). Racialised neighborhoods
like East Vancouver, Chinatown, Strathcona
(where Hogan’s Alley used to be) are designated
as a series of subterranean caverns called the
Shadow Realm, bearing in mind that this was the
location of the first immigrant and racialized
neighborhood which suffered a process of neglect
and industrialization.
The idea of a paracosmic Vancouver works as a
mean to create and navigate through urban
imaginary racialized spaces superimposed on the
actual city. We are presented with the other side of
the coin: a parody of the simcity, the conceived
space operated by the hegemonic power. We see
how it reads the human geography and space of the
city, showing once again that no space is neutral,
but a correlation of forces in the lived space.
The game is basically always running, and
although the face-to- face meetings that
players hold monthly during the spring and
summer in parks and camp-grounds are
important, their movements online also
extend play into a real-time, 24/7 digital
experience at home, at work, at school,
always. The storylines (…) are carefully
crafted by Langenderbach behind the
scenes (…) [H]e can and does manipulate
the results he desires. (Compton 2014:162)
At this stage, paracosmic civilian vs. government-
imposed discourses through Enfortech, parallels
multiculturalism-from-below versus Western
liberal state multiculturalism.
State multiculturalism, according to Walcott
(2016) tries to contain the multiplicity of
trajectories and cosmologies that share the urban
space, so they do not overflow on the postcolonial
wound, the transnational migratory flows and the
persistent systemic racism in Western metropolis.
State multiculturalism, adopted by Western liberal
democracies, is read as a racial contract to manage
and neutralize post-WWII struggles for social and
economic justice by racial and cultural minorities,
and to constrain the movement of mainly non-white
migrants into national spaces, which had formerly
imagined, represented and performed themselves
as entirely white. State multiculturalism sought to
contain such uprisings through policies centered
on identity and culture while maintaining and
retaining the power to authorize and legitimize the
material relations of the nation-state.
This applies not only to the official multiculturalism
or the cultural relativism that dissolves Black
subjectivity in a universalist melting pot but also
to the narrow cultural essentialism that promotes
polarizing discourses such as Black Nationalism
or Afrocentrism.
Langenderbach’s appropriation of the LARP
means the disruption of a real-and-imagined space
“for those who feel themselves to be outcasts and
misfits . . . where people came to feel enveloped in
an atmosphere of acceptance, which remained the
subculture’s best feature. It was a place where the
weird was welcome” (Compton 2014:163). This
virtual world, this paracosmic Vancouver
superimposed on the real city was appealing to
those who do not conform with the dominant
concept of citizenship in racialized liberal
democracies and looking for an atmosphere of
acceptance in safe communities.
The island was bought by the federal government
and turned into Pauline Johnson Island Special
Detention Facility, a prison for immigrants
classified as Individual and Collective
Displacement Phenomenon. The island has
become a carceral space, yet the conversion of the
residential tower into detention housing is barely
FLICKERING BODIES: MAPPING MULTICULTURALISM AND INSURGENT CITIZENSHIP IN WAYDE COMPTON’S BLACK VANCOUVER
118
/ Número 9 /
DICIEMBRE, 2019
(109-123)
perceptible.
The island as a carceral space has two symbolic
layers: First, it symbolizes oppressive hegemonic
discourse of race, ethnicity, multiculturalism. And
second, it symbolizes an urban space, a prison
archipelago where people have restricted mobility
through space and is closely guarded despite the
appearance of free movement.
These ideas are clarified through Barbara Hooper’s
concept of somatography (quoted in Soja 1996),
body-writing, a hierarchical differentiation of the
flesh, the understanding of the human body as a
highly intervened space, transformed by
interpretations and cultural representations, a
social space.
Every society produces its own order, its
own spaces, its own bodies, cities and
texts, socially produced spaces, always in
process, always flowing . . . Body and city
are the subjects of a social/civic discourse,
of an imaginary obsessed with fear of unruly
elements . . . These acts of differentiation,
separation and enclosure involve material,
symbolic and lived spaces . . . bodies cities
and texts . . . and are practiced as politics of
difference, as segregation and separation.
(Soja 1996:114)
They and we are dichotomously spatialized and
enclosed in an imposed territoriality of apartheids,
ghettoes, fortresses and other trappings that
emanate from the center-periphery relation.
Hegemonic power universalizes and contains
difference in real-and-imagined spaces (Soja
1996:87). Racialized immigrants are dehumanised
and held back based on meanings ascribed by
somatography to notions of race, nation and space.
“Each year, an average of eleven thousand
migrants, a large number of whom are racialized,
are held in immigration detention in Canada,
including over eight hundred children” (Maynard
2017:166). Immigration detention centres, unlike
prisons, represent administrative punishment for
not having adequate documentation or when
considered illegal human beings. Since it is not
punitive incarceration, they do not have legal
guarantees as a right to a lawyer since there are no
charges or trials against them. The incarceration of
these migrants reflects the impact of unwanted
migrations in the discourses of liberal democracies
and human rights. It shows that the interests of the
liberal state are not really the people and highlights
the B-side of globalisation.
Thus, the called Individual and Collective
Displacement Phenomenon has multiple
interpretations:
First, as the departure from liberal multiculturalism.
In Canada, official multiculturalism is the state’s
liberal response to racial, ethnic, and cultural
diversity, in that it attempts to respond to ethnic
particularities as a step towards achieving
integration, into a universal, inclusive national
culture. Official multiculturalism assumes the
national culture as the existing, normative, national
culture of the hegemonic whiteness, while it does
not address racism systematically (Lee & Lutz
2005:17).
It is a discourse that does not recognize racialized
bodies as part of the foundational narrative of
Canada, framing them in the discourse of Canada
as an anti-slavery Canaan but fails to recognize
Blackness as Canadian in the Western provinces,
particularly in Vancouver. Compton defines this
departure as the roots of Aphroperipheralism: a
challenging, but creative position rejecting the
transplant of Afrocentrism or African-Americana
to British Columbia and also the white scripts of
nation-building or the vapidness of liberal
multiculturalism: it is the resistance to both
assimilation and elision.
Secondly, the transformation of the island into a
detention centre also points to First Nations
peoples relocation and Canadian colonialism. The
racialization and discipline across the Canadian
space, and in this case, the Vancouverite, is marked
by its settler colonialism trajectory. The forced
relocation of First Nations peoples into
reservations and residential schools was the first
stage of dispossession of their territory and their
political attachment, thus giving way to the
extraction of resources and establishment of settler
societies.
FLICKERING BODIES: MAPPING MULTICULTURALISM AND INSURGENT CITIZENSHIP IN WAYDE COMPTON’S BLACK VANCOUVER
119
/ Número 9 /
DICIEMBRE, 2019
(109-123)
More recently, the focus has shifted to the penal
system to continue the colonial control of space and,
despite constituting a five per cent of the Canadian
population, Indigenous peoples represent a quarter
of the prison population (Maynard 2017:85).
Statistics by the VPD show that Blacks make up
1% of the population and 4% of reported street-
checks; while Indigenous people make up 2% of
the population and 15% of reported street-checks
and 39% of homeless people in Metro Vancouver
(Manojlovic 2018)
A second interpretation of the island as a carceral
space is the rejection of the urban modernist
discourse of progress through constant renewal,
the formation of transcultural, intersectional
movements to claim the right to the city, the right
to difference. A space of radical openness. These
bodies flicker literally:
the inmates appear to have the free run of
the building. There’s a yard they are
allowed access to, but in shifts. It’s fenced
in, . . . I got the sense it was routine to find
migrants outside and on other parts of the
island . . . Entire groups of migrants
disappeared and reappeared outside the
walls of the facility, and had to be escorted
back in. They disappear from their various
units and appear all together beyond the
walls of the building, standing in a crowd.
(Compton 2014:170-171)
Rezoning the unassimilable, abject bodies are sent
to a remote, inaccessible space, separated from the
rest of the city with barriers, in this case, the sea,
under disciplinary control. This spatial isolation
has its counterpart. One girl, the only inmate that
had learned to speak English, being mistaken for a
holographic immigrant, she is locked in this prison
due to the citizens’ hysteria against the racialized
bodies. The isolation of the island, reflecting the
uneven urban development and lack of basic
services, prevents the girl from receiving medical
assistance, and she dies from an asthmatic crisis.
This aspect mirrors the isolated conditions of
neglected neighbourhoods, carceral urban spaces
to control racialized bodies and those considered
aliens. In the case of Vancouver, the depiction of
Hogan’s Alley as a blighted slum prior to its
demolishment (Compton 2010). The death of this
girl, from the point of view of the imprisonment of
racialized immigrants, is not unusual given that
“at least fourteen have died while behind bars
since 2000” (Maynard 2017:171).
The holographic projections were developed as
part of the Multiple Perception Immobilization
Device, providing the police with a non-lethal
security solution for crowd control. The said
device:
projects holographic images of people into
a crowd, causing a perceived doubling or
tripling of the crowd density, in turn causing
rioting individuals to perceive themselves
as surrounded by far denser crowd that is
the case. The device initially scans the
subjects, making composite holograms by
recombining facial features, clothing, etc.
so that its seeded projections closely
resemble the demographics of the targeted
crowd . . . the rioters become distracted,
slowed, and ultimately vulnerable to other
pacification measures. (Compton
2014:181)
For the people in the crowd, it is impossible to
discern the holographic three-dimensional bodies
from their real companions and the effect is:
like standing in the middle of a sea of
people, and though I could pass through the
hologram, and realized projections were
being used, the realism of the imagery was
enough to make me hesitate significantly,
and after colliding with more than one
person I’d taken for fake, I moved more
slowly and uncertainly, which is the
machine intended function . . . I saw a
particular ‘person’ in the crowd and
immediately felt a sense of recognition,
seeing some of my own facial features as it
passed. (Compton 2014:188)
FLICKERING BODIES: MAPPING MULTICULTURALISM AND INSURGENT CITIZENSHIP IN WAYDE COMPTON’S BLACK VANCOUVER
120
/ Número 9 /
DICIEMBRE, 2019
(109-123)
Canada officially proclaims multiculturalism: a
space that neither others nor represses racial
mixing and simultaneously eviscerates restrictive
creations of identity. Being multiracial equals a
prediction to struggle with carving a space in this
official Multiculturalism that overemphasizes the
cultural pattern while ignoring the presence of a
racialized geography. As it was said at the
beginning of this article, the situation in Vancouver
is a special one, characterized by a high degree of
interethnic exchange and the lack of a central
Black community.
In After Canaan, Compton(2010) asserts that the
average Black person in B.C. seems to be a light-
skinned, mixed-race person. He dwells upon this
topic and the act of passing, which is commonly
burdened on the person whose race is being
questioned, while the mis/perception of race is the
responsibility of the viewer. Borrowing from
biology, Compton adapts the term pheneticizing,
denoting classification according to an assessment
of physical appearances rather than the
identification of shared ancestry.
The holographic bodies are not real; they are
simulations and a particular type of somatography
created by the apparatuses of the State, Power and
official Multiculturalism that, even though might
seem real, they are just void images that paralyze
the progress of the citizens who claim a space. It
can be interpreted as a clash for a racialized space
in the city, between state liberal multiculturalism
versus a growing multiculturalism-from-below,
which allows for more rhizomatic and complex
identities, as opposed to simplistic stereotypes and
racialization of bodies.
It also reflects a struggle against a discourse and
weapons that seem to be verging into the
simulation and fable, like the media depiction of
Hogan’s Alley prior to its demise, a matter of
illusion failing in the light of verisimilitude.
Compton effectively satirizes on the fictional
character of racial definitions and as he does with
Aphroperipheralism, and struggles against
compulsive control procedures: Fragmentation,
mutilating the information so it fits into a code;
homogenization to express the information in a
predictable code; and repetition, reducing
differences to small variations of the same item.
An adaptation of the concept of urban psychasthenia
in a postmetropolis such as Vancouver will prove
accurate to analyse the failure to recognize the
differences between the citizens’ bodies, the
holograms, and end up assigning them the status
of immigrants instead of recognizing their space
within the national narrative.
Defined as a disturbance between the self
and surrounding territory, psychasthenia is
a state in which the space defined by the
coordinates of the organism’s own body is
confused with represented space. Incapable
of demarcating the limits of its own body,
lost in the immense area that circumscribes
it, the psychasthenic organism proceeds to
abandon its own identity to embrace the
space beyond. […] This simulation effects
a double usurpation: while the organism
successfully reproduces those elements it
could not otherwise apprehend, in the
process it is swallowed up by them,
vanishing as a differentiated entity.
(Olalquiaga 2014:31-32)
Psychasthenia helps us situate the holograms and
racialized bodies in a place where the powers of
conceived representations of space find new ways
to reproduce its dominance, also affecting the
lived space, especially the increasingly
camouflaged racialized Black body in Vancouver.
As a consequence, there is a growing incapacity of
our minds to map not just the city, but also the
bodies and multiculturalism-from-below that
inhabit it.
At the end of the book, we see the ghosts of the
immigrant girl and the dead Pan-Indian activist
looking at the city burning in the distance. They
take a boat row towards the ruins to take another
one like them. They find a hologram, now called
composite, indicating a mixture of features, as in
the multicultural city or the multiracial bodies that
disrupt liberal multiculturalism, and gives it
agency, no longer a ghostly image.
The holograms escape the categorization of
individuals as unitary, coherent and already
FLICKERING BODIES: MAPPING MULTICULTURALISM AND INSURGENT CITIZENSHIP IN WAYDE COMPTON’S BLACK VANCOUVER
121
/ Número 9 /
DICIEMBRE, 2019
(109-123)
constituted subjects, and they hold multiple, open
and porous subjectivities always in the process of
formation. They take him to the island. As they row
away from the city, they are exceeding the range
of the projectors and thus the government reach for
definition, so the composite starts flickering then
disappears, only to appear again when they reach
the island.
The girl is “excited to be a knowing guide and
takes the composite by the hand to show him the
detention center, the research facilities, the other
shores, the people who can’t perceive them”
(Compton 2014:193). The three are ghosts,
invisible to the others around them, yet they are
still in that lived space. Like Vancouver’s Black
community and First Nations peoples, they are
there, fighting against erasure and elision,
occupying a figurative island for the immigrant,
racialized bodies. This voices from the borderlands
“inhabit and embody the new cultural politics of
difference, complicating that politics with
intersectionalities of race, class, ethnicity, gender,
and sexual preference formations of ‘difference’”
(Sandercock 2013:26-27).
Despite this dystopian ending, there is still hope.
There is an opportunity for Afroperipheralism and
multiculturalism-from-below to create a space of
radical openness to keep claiming a space in the
city, an open, progressive space informed with the
possibilities of the psychasthenia. “At dawn he and
she and the newcomer will make plans to
rendezvous with those yet to come. They will
discuss what it means to regroup” (Compton
2014:194).
CONCLUSIONS
To conclude, in the struggle for the right to the city
of Vancouver deeply related to identity, space and
the body act as metaphors in the reformulation of
cultural identity. Compton’s stories destabilize the
ideas assumed of Canada as a white, benevolent
and just nation by building spaces of resistance
rooted in the nation.
While they question it, they involve it ethically
to develop ideas of nationality, belonging and
citizenship, and as Black and First Nations
individuals are configured within the urban and
national geohistories. Confused in a city of glass
with transparent borders and an invisibilised body,
Black identity fluctuates between opposite
possibilities.
On the one hand, there is a psychasthenic
dissolution into space, disappearing into the
cityscape. Without a body, identity adheres to any
scenario like a disposable costume. On the other
hand, Black identity can take advantage of this
border-crossing feature, reverting the
psychasthenic process before the final step of
dissolution, enjoying more extensive borders. This
means to fight against fragmentation and rigid
categorization. The battle for this vanishing body
is manifested in the fight for the territory.
In the case of Black Vancouver, there is an
extremely hybrid identity lacking a specific
cultural space that cannot be defined on the basis
of national origins or other inherent relations of
belonging, but according to the network of
relations that this group and individuals establish
in their everyday life and their actions in the real-
and-imagined Vancouver.
This is where Wayde Compton’s stories point to:
rejecting the choices that modernist discourses
imposed upon the activist Black subject. It points
to the adoption of a space that is simultaneously
central and marginal; an identity that is not
informed by a narrow cultural nationalism.
It is marginality that one chooses as a site of
resistance; an open space of possibility from
which to articulate their sense of the world,
claiming a space of ones’ own in the city and in
the national narrative while being inside and
outside at the same time. Associations like the
United African Communities of B.C. represent
Africans establishing capitalist networks for the
development of African-owned businesses and
claim spaces for these communities through
everyday life practices (Creese 2011).
Transcultural associations defend the integration
of subaltern cosmologies against the dominant
ones in the City of Vancouver: Hogan’s Alley
Trust achieved ownership of space in Strathcona
FLICKERING BODIES: MAPPING MULTICULTURALISM AND INSURGENT CITIZENSHIP IN WAYDE COMPTON’S BLACK VANCOUVER
122
/ Número 9 /
DICIEMBRE, 2019
(109-123)
to use it for residential, cultural and commercial
purposes instead of speculation. In 2019 this work
paid off with the opening of Nora Hendrix Place, a
52-unit temporary modular housing development
primarily for Black and Indigenous homeless
(Green 2019).
The result of this analysis of Compton’s work is
that the production of space cannot be understood
only from the dominant prism. It needs the
perspective of those insurgents who question the
stratification of society through space and build a
counter-hegemonic cosmology. It is about multiple
encounters and the transcultural interactions that
complete the story. Compton’s narrative weaves
complex networks of collaboration in the
interrelation of differences instead of assimilations
or exclusions presented by regressive discourses.
Compton’s cartography of Vancouver in The Outer
Harbour connects familiar Black narratives with
other racialized experiences of the city beyond the
community and ethnic-racial boundaries,
engaging with the lives of a multi-ethnic cast of
characters. Acknowledging the more racially
hostile experience of the Asian and First Nations
peoples in the B.C. context, Compton refuses any
unitary narrative of Black pride or uplifting,
instead articulating a narrative tapestry of diasporic
subjects within and beyond the Black community.
Compton radical open space allows for inter-
ethnic connections and a site of “political
encounters that reveal an ensemble of diverse and
interracial subject positions that, together, explore
the stakes of imagining more humanly workable
geographies” (McKittrick & Woods 2007:108).
In the current moment of global turn towards
conservative discourses on race and immigration,
a conclusion that can be drawn from this analysis
of Compton’s work is that beyond nationalist
discourses, the city becomes the space from which
to articulate alliances and emancipatory political
projects beyond the dominant geohistory. In The
Outer Harbour’s Vancouver, the metropolis is not
a space of resolution or closure, but a space of
possibility from which a multiculturalism-from-
below, driven by the intimacies of urban life and
transculturation might be possible.
BIBLIOGRAPHICAL
REFERENCES
Creese, G. (2011). The New African Diaspora in
Vancouver. Toronto: University of Toronto
Press.
Compton, W. (2010). After Canaan. Vancouver,
Canada: Arsenal Pulp Press.
Compton, W. (2014). The Outer Harbour.
Vancouver: Arsenal Pulp Press.
Epstein, D. (1998). Afraid/Not: Psychoanalytic
Directions for an Insurgent Planning
Historiography. In L. Sandercock (ed.).
Making the Invisible Visible: A
Multicultural Planning History (pp 209-
227). University of California Press.
Grosz, E. (1992). Bodies-Cities. In B. Colomina
(ed.). Sexuality and Space (pp. 241-253).
Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Green, M. (March 3, 2019). City and province
open doors to housing project focused on
Vancouver’s racialized people
experiencing homelessness. The Star.
Retrieved from https://www.thestar.
com/vancouver/2019/03/03/city-and-
province-open-doors-to-housing-project-
focused-on-vancouvers-racialized-people-
experiencing-homelessness.html
Hayden, D. (1995). The Power of Place: Urban
Landscapes as Public History. Cambridge:
The MIT Press. Print.
Harvey D. (2017). El cosmopolitismo y las
geografías de la libertad. España:
Ediciones Akal.
Holston, J. (1998). Spaces of Insurgent Citizenship.
In L. Sandercock (ed.). Making the Invisible
Visible: A Multicultural Planning History
(pp37-57). University of California Press.
Lee, J. & Lutz, J. (eds.) (2005). Situating “Race”
and Racisms in Space, Time and Theory.
McGuill-Queen’s University Press. Print.
Lee, J. (2007). Gender, Ethnicity, and Hybrid
Forms of Community-Based Urban
FLICKERING BODIES: MAPPING MULTICULTURALISM AND INSURGENT CITIZENSHIP IN WAYDE COMPTON’S BLACK VANCOUVER
123
/ Número 9 /
DICIEMBRE, 2019
(109-123)
Activism in Vancouver, 19571978: The
Strathcona Story Revisited. Gender, Place
& Culture, 14(4), 381407.
Leow, J. (2012). Re-Map, Re-Cover, and Re-
Perform: Interdiscursivity and the Poetry
of Wayde Compton. Canadian Literature:
A Quarterly of Criticism and Review, 214,
47-66.
Manojlovic, D. (2018). Understanding Street
Checks. (Report No. 1809C01). Retrieved
from https://vancouver.ca/police/
policeboard/doc/SP-3-2-VPD-report-
back-and-Understanding-Street-Checks-
Appendix-Report.pdf
Massey, D. (2008). for space. London: SAGE
Publications Ltd.
Maynard, R. (2017). Policing Black Lives: State
Violence in Canada From Slavery to the
Present. Nova Scotia: Fernwood
Publishing.
McKittrick, K & Woods, C. (eds.). (2007). Black
Geographies and the Politics of Place.
Toronto: Between the Lines.
Olalquiaga, C. (2014). Megalópolis. Santiago de
Chile: Metales Pesados.
Omi, M. & Winant, H. (2015). Racial Formation
in the United States. New York: Routledge.
Pablo, C. (March 1, 2018). City of Vancouver now
defines $3,702 rent as ‘affordable’ housing.
The Georgia Straight. Retrieved from
https://www.straight.com/news/1039161/
city-vancouver-now-defines-3702-rent-
affordable-housing
Sandercock, L. (ed.). 1998. Making the Invisible
Visible: A Multicultural Planning History.
USA: University of California Press.
Sandercock, L. (2013). Cosmopolis 2: Mongrel
Cities in the 21st Century. London:
Bloomsbury Academic.
Soja, E. (1996). Thirdspace. Malden: Blackwell.
Print.
Soja, E. (2003). Writing the City Spatially.
City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture,
Theory, Policy, Action, 7(3), 269-280. doi:
10.1080/1360481032000157478
Wade, J. (1994). Houses for All: The Struggle for
Social Housing in Vancouver, 1919- 1950.
Vancouver: University of British Columbia
Press.
Walcott, R. (2016). Queer Returns: Essays on
Multiculturalism, Diaspora, and Black
Studies. Ontario: Insomniac Press.